Re: [Iaufec] Call for regional committee votes on WCS III
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: <mcalabre_at_email.protected>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:18:19 +1000
On Mon 2005/05/23 15:25:01 -0400, William Pence wrote
in a message to: IAU-FITS Exec Committee <iaufec_at_nrao.<!--nospam-->edu>
>Call for Regional FITS Committee Votes on WCS Paper III
As chair of the Australasian Regional FITS committee I am pleased to
report that all members of the committee have now voted on the proposal:
six in favour and one abstention.
The abstainee said "I don't see a problem in voting 'yes', but since I'm
not properly up with the play, I had better vote 'abstain'". Several
respondees expressed a similar sentiment to a lesser degree - that they
had not analysed the paper in detail but had sufficient confidence in it
to vote 'yes'. None reported any specific shortcomings or misgivings.
Regards,
Mark Calabretta
ATNF
Received on 2005-06-17 10:18:33
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:18:19 +1000
On Mon 2005/05/23 15:25:01 -0400, William Pence wrote
in a message to: IAU-FITS Exec Committee <iaufec_at_nrao.<!--nospam-->edu>
>Call for Regional FITS Committee Votes on WCS Paper III
As chair of the Australasian Regional FITS committee I am pleased to
report that all members of the committee have now voted on the proposal:
six in favour and one abstention.
The abstainee said "I don't see a problem in voting 'yes', but since I'm
not properly up with the play, I had better vote 'abstain'". Several
respondees expressed a similar sentiment to a lesser degree - that they
had not analysed the paper in detail but had sufficient confidence in it
to vote 'yes'. None reported any specific shortcomings or misgivings.
Regards,
Mark Calabretta
ATNF
Received on 2005-06-17 10:18:33