Re: v156f1 & v162c1
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: <rdodson_at_email.protected>
Date: 11 Nov 2004 15:01:22 +0100
On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 00:09, Jim Lovell wrote:
>Hi Richard,
>
>RE v162c1:
>
>>> Normal Tid freqs (Please confirm -- that is LCP and 1634 MHz - would
>>> 1650 be preferred?)
>
>I'd prefer 1650 +/- 16 MHz. There's a fair bit of interference in the
>low end of the band. Is that OK with everyone else?
Jim has just reminded me of the trouble that use to exist (in Spectral
lines) in Hobart at the ~ 1667 MHz range. Are these fixed?
R
Received on 2004-11-12 01:01:44
Date: 11 Nov 2004 15:01:22 +0100
On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 00:09, Jim Lovell wrote:
>Hi Richard,
>
>RE v162c1:
>
>>> Normal Tid freqs (Please confirm -- that is LCP and 1634 MHz - would
>>> 1650 be preferred?)
>
>I'd prefer 1650 +/- 16 MHz. There's a fair bit of interference in the
>low end of the band. Is that OK with everyone else?
Jim has just reminded me of the trouble that use to exist (in Spectral
lines) in Hobart at the ~ 1667 MHz range. Are these fixed?
R
Received on 2004-11-12 01:01:44