Re: LBA dates for the next session
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: <John.Reynolds_at_email.protected>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 17:51:20 +1000 (EST)
Jim,
>So far November 1-7 seems the best week for the first session but
>this relies on Parkes starting their maintenance a tad late. John?
Bit hard to commit to this 100% yet but I'll work towards it.
Cheers
JR
>On 24/06/2005, at 5:40 PM, Tasso Tzioumis wrote:
>
>>> Oct 24-30 is URSI meeting. Probably few people affected (mainly me?)
>
>Is anyone else going to the URSI meeting?
>
>>> Steve suggested January. That can be difficult with many people on
>>> vacation.
>>> Is Tid going to be back in January?
>>> Also, January + March makes the tape situation difficult. It's not
>>> impossible if I become a bit more ruthless.
>
>The 70m is due back in January. At this stage though the DSN schedule
>doesn't go past the end of the year so it's impossible to nominate a
>suitable week at the moment.
>
>I wanted to avoid January for the reasons Tasso gives above.
>
>There are enough proposals not requiring Tid that I could fill a week
>in October/November without a problem.
>
>My hope is that March is sufficiently far in the future that the DSN
>schedulers will be able to move as much 70m time as possible into the
>week we nominate.
>
>Cheers,
>Jim
>
Received on 2005-06-30 17:51:52
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 17:51:20 +1000 (EST)
Jim,
>So far November 1-7 seems the best week for the first session but
>this relies on Parkes starting their maintenance a tad late. John?
Bit hard to commit to this 100% yet but I'll work towards it.
Cheers
JR
>On 24/06/2005, at 5:40 PM, Tasso Tzioumis wrote:
>
>>> Oct 24-30 is URSI meeting. Probably few people affected (mainly me?)
>
>Is anyone else going to the URSI meeting?
>
>>> Steve suggested January. That can be difficult with many people on
>>> vacation.
>>> Is Tid going to be back in January?
>>> Also, January + March makes the tape situation difficult. It's not
>>> impossible if I become a bit more ruthless.
>
>The 70m is due back in January. At this stage though the DSN schedule
>doesn't go past the end of the year so it's impossible to nominate a
>suitable week at the moment.
>
>I wanted to avoid January for the reasons Tasso gives above.
>
>There are enough proposals not requiring Tid that I could fill a week
>in October/November without a problem.
>
>My hope is that March is sufficiently far in the future that the DSN
>schedulers will be able to move as much 70m time as possible into the
>week we nominate.
>
>Cheers,
>Jim
>
Received on 2005-06-30 17:51:52