Re: Progress toward New Zealand VLBI
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: <Chris.Phillips_at_email.protected>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 12:40:20 +1000 (EST)
Hi Sergei,
>P.S. When in Hobart, we tried interferometry for OH maser
>330.878-0.367 with strong (S~300 Jy) but narrow (5-7 km/s) emission
>line in 1665 MHZ. We could see strong OH line in the spectrum received
>on the 14m with NZ system (first NZ radio spectroscopy?).
>Surprisingly, we got strong fringe between Hobart and ATCA. Adam
>promptly found the explanation: there is a 8 Jy HII region associated
>with this maser source.
If you detected an HII region with VLBI I would be suprised (in a good
way). Are you sure it was not just the OH maser?
Cheers
Chris
Received on 2005-08-31 12:40:35
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 12:40:20 +1000 (EST)
Hi Sergei,
>P.S. When in Hobart, we tried interferometry for OH maser
>330.878-0.367 with strong (S~300 Jy) but narrow (5-7 km/s) emission
>line in 1665 MHZ. We could see strong OH line in the spectrum received
>on the 14m with NZ system (first NZ radio spectroscopy?).
>Surprisingly, we got strong fringe between Hobart and ATCA. Adam
>promptly found the explanation: there is a 8 Jy HII region associated
>with this maser source.
If you detected an HII region with VLBI I would be suprised (in a good
way). Are you sure it was not just the OH maser?
Cheers
Chris
Received on 2005-08-31 12:40:35