Re: Ceduna phase stability
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: <richard.dodson_at_email.protected>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:43:47 +0800
Hi
>>>>From John's comments though it sounds like there may not be a problem
I have not seen any comments from John on the wider discussion.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Chris Phillips<Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au> wrote:
>I was thinking something similar to Jim. Are there any 1921-293 scans which
>have been recorded. It would be worth correlating that data as a priority.
>
And/or C-band. Which does not use the Agilent LO
Richard
Received on 2009-08-17 14:44:06
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:43:47 +0800
Hi
>>>>From John's comments though it sounds like there may not be a problem
I have not seen any comments from John on the wider discussion.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Chris Phillips<Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au> wrote:
>I was thinking something similar to Jim. Are there any 1921-293 scans which
>have been recorded. It would be worth correlating that data as a priority.
>
And/or C-band. Which does not use the Agilent LO
Richard
Received on 2009-08-17 14:44:06