Re: Ceduna phase stability
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: <Jim.Lovell_at_email.protected>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:50:52 +1000
On 17/08/2009, at 2:43 PM, Richard Dodson wrote:
>Hi
>
>>>From John's comments though it sounds like there may not be a
>>>problem
>
>I have not seen any comments from John on the wider discussion.
Sorry, here they are:
"I looked at some of the data on Aquib's page, and I guess I don't
see the problem. The s/n at Ceduna is low at high frequencies,
because we are using a room temperature receiver and because the dish
deforms more severely than Hobart or the ATNF dishes. But i don't see
any phase jumps in any of the Ceduna data where the s/n is strong
enough to make it possible to see them if they were there."
-Jim
Received on 2009-08-17 14:51:37
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:50:52 +1000
On 17/08/2009, at 2:43 PM, Richard Dodson wrote:
>Hi
>
>>>From John's comments though it sounds like there may not be a
>>>problem
>
>I have not seen any comments from John on the wider discussion.
Sorry, here they are:
"I looked at some of the data on Aquib's page, and I guess I don't
see the problem. The s/n at Ceduna is low at high frequencies,
because we are using a room temperature receiver and because the dish
deforms more severely than Hobart or the ATNF dishes. But i don't see
any phase jumps in any of the Ceduna data where the s/n is strong
enough to make it possible to see them if they were there."
-Jim
Received on 2009-08-17 14:51:37