This loads a font easier to read for people with dyslexia.
This renders the document in high contrast mode.
This renders the document as white on black
This can help those with trouble processing rapid screen movements.

Re: Odd behaviour at Ceduna - Who would have believed it?

From: <Brett.Reid_at_email.protected>
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 09:17:34 +1100

Hi Richard and John,
So this experiment was performed about 12 months ago. Aidan, Bruce and I
installed the additional new maser and IF cables in the twister prior to
the December run, 3 months ago.

I wonder if the problem is fixed?

Regards,
Brett

John Dickey wrote:
>Dear Richard,
>
>That is odd behavior. But I only have one plot, did you attach
>more? The one I got is 4.2 Mby, a bit much for just 25 or 30 points to
>display. There seem to be frequent jumps from low rate to high rate,
>but both are pretty consistent. A wrap problem is possible, but we just
>replaced all the cables, all the way from the receivers to the control
>room.
>
>Anyway, if there were more figures in your mail, could you please
>compress them and resend? Thanks for your help.
>
>cheers,
>jd
>
>On 05/03/2010, at 2:00 AM, Richard Dodson wrote:
>
>>Hi Tassie-siders
>>
>>You must tremble every time I get some data. Here is something from
>>VX014B which _might_ help with the Ceduna problems.
>>
>>After a few steps to remove basic instrument offsets I get these
>>residuals.
>>
>>See how Ceduna has a high rate about 1/2 the time? (page 1, PL 4).
>>I thought at first that a source must have a very bad position, or
>>that the antenna position must be bad and only sensitive to some
>>source coordinates.
>>
>>But compare that to Ceduna (and everyone else) plotted against
>>Hour Angle. When HA is negative rates are low. When HA is positive
>>rates are high. (page 2 PL 2, page 3 PL 3).
>>
>>Odd behaviour at Ceduna - Who would have believed it?
>>
>>I am guessing that what we see here is a change of rate when the
>>wrap changes, which I guess means that something is getting stretched,
>>but I don't see what that would introduce a rate change.
>>
>>Phases are fine pre-HA=0, all over the shop post HA=0. (page 4, PL 5
>>for amplitude RMS, page 5 PL 7 for phases).
>>
>>
>>Have fun with this info!
>>
>>Richard
>><CEDUNA_ODD.PS>
>
>
-- 
Brett Reid
Observatory Manager, Radio Astronomy Group
University of Tasmania, School of Mathematics and Physics
Phone +61 3 6248 5285
Mobile 0407 955 283
email brett.reid_at_utas.<!--nospam-->edu.au
web   http://www-ra.phys.utas.edu.au/~breid
Received on 2010-03-05 09:17:52