Re: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: <Chris.Phillips_at_email.protected>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 17:58:48 +1000
Yes - Shinji good point
I will not really have much time if any before hand to create a new schedule... Just if you track the same source and same setup as v430a all should be good.
Cheers
Chris
On 03/04/2011, at 5:52 PM, Horiuchi, Shinji wrote:
>Hi Chris,
>
>I have just realised that the schedule for the fringe test vc142 prior
>to v430a tonight is still for old one for different experiment (16MHz).
>What are we actually going to do with vc142? Shall we point 3c273 with
>the same setup for v430a (64MHz)?
>
>Cheers,
>Shinji.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2011 7:22 PM
>To: Horiuchi, Shinji
>Cc: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au; c.reynolds_at_curtin.<!--nospam-->edu.au
>Subject: Re: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>
>Hi Shinji
>
>Try:
>
>ftp.atnf.csiro.au:/pub/people/vlbi/v430/v430a/Tid/v430a.vex
>
>(or something like that).
>
>I had to remove Warkworth from this schedule but Tid seems OK.
>
>Just record a single 64 MHz channel in cdisko.
>
>Cheers
>Chris
>
>On 02/04/2011, at 7:15 PM, Horiuchi, Shinji wrote:
>
>>Yes, please!
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>>Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2011 6:35 PM
>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>Subject: Re: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>
>>Do you want me to make up a schedule with Tid - can do it immediately,
>>if you like
>>
>>Cheers
>>Chris
>>
>>On 02/04/2011, at 6:26 PM, Horiuchi, Shinji wrote:
>>
>>>VC142 and V430a at 64MHz for DSS-45.
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>>>Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2011 5:53 PM
>>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>Subject: Re: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>
>>>Hi Shinji
>>>
>>>Which experiment are we talking about....?
>>>
>>>On 02/04/2011, at 5:49 PM, Horiuchi, Shinji wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hi Phil,
>>>>
>>>>As of today I can't see Tid in the schedule file (.vex) etc. Is
>still
>>>>Tid expected?
>>>>
>>>>As I told you before, this would be recorded to LBA-DR without a
>>>>PC-field system for this particular time as it's going to be used
>for
>>>>other project. Assuming Tid is required I will make up a predict
>file
>>>so
>>>>that DSS-34 can point sources without the PC-field system.
>>>>
>>>>Cheers,
>>>>Shinji.
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>>Sent: Friday, 1 April 2011 12:02 PM
>>>>To: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au
>>>>Cc: Cormac Reynolds
>>>>Subject: FW: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>>
>>>>Hi Phil and Cormac,
>>>>
>>>>We have got those additional time scheduled. Let me know when vc142
>>>and
>>>>v430a schedule files are ready.
>>>>
>>>>Cormac, in case v271h proc file doesn't work for DSS-34, can I use
>>>v271g
>>>>one instead?
>>>>
>>>>Cheers,
>>>>Shinji.
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Ward, Carleen
>>>>Sent: Friday, 1 April 2011 10:59 AM
>>>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; Martinez, George
>>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>>
>>>>Shinji,
>>>>You should be able to see these in the schedule now.
>>>>
>>>>Thank you.
>>>>
>>>>Regards,
>>>>Carleen
>>>>
>>>>THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR EXPORT CONTROL AND IT DOES NOT
>>>>CONTAIN EXPORT CONTROLLED TECHNICAL DATA.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>>Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 2:30 PM
>>>>To: Ward, Carleen; Martinez, George
>>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>>
>>>>Carleen,
>>>>
>>>>These do not seem to be in place yet as far as I can see with
>>>ClicTrack.
>>>>Could you check?
>>>>
>>>>Regards,
>>>>Shinji.
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Ward, Carleen
>>>>Sent: Thursday, 31 March 2011 10:36 AM
>>>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; Martinez, George
>>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>>
>>>>Shinji,
>>>>On DOY 092, DSS-34 is only available from 1635-1910. If the station
>>>>allows you to start during the GTL track, that would be between you
>>>and
>>>>the station. I can not schedule GBRA any earlier or it will create
>a
>>>>conflict.
>>>>
>>>>The following supports have been scheduled for you:
>>>>
>>>>092 1635 1635 1910 1910 DSS-34 GBRA TANAMI NONE
>>>>1B2
>>>>
>>>>093 1150 1235 2150 2220 DSS-45 GBRA TANAMI NONE
>>>>1B2
>>>>
>>>>Thank you.
>>>>
>>>>Regards,
>>>>Carleen
>>>>
>>>>THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR EXPORT CONTROL AND IT DOES NOT
>>>>CONTAIN EXPORT CONTROLLED TECHNICAL DATA.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>>Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 4:21 PM
>>>>To: Ward, Carleen; Martinez, George
>>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>>
>>>>Hi Carleen and George,
>>>>
>>>>Any chance to see these blocks that I am requesting (on DOY 92, 93,
>>>and
>>>>94) in the DSN schedule soon?
>>>>
>>>>The DSS-43 TANAMI run last night went very well and I recorded data
>>>for
>>>>nearly 13 hours. Thanks for your scheduling coordination. I returned
>>>the
>>>>70m to maintenance team this morning, anticipating to resume the 24
>>>hour
>>>>schedule whenever they finish the scheduled tasks.
>>>>
>>>>Cheers,
>>>>Shinji.
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>>Sent: Wednesday, 30 March 2011 3:06 PM
>>>>To: Ward, Carleen; Martinez, George
>>>>Cc: 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>>
>>>>Carleen,
>>>>
>>>>Please add also the following small block after GTL,
>>>>
>>>>094/0010-0135 DSS-45 GBRA
>>>>
>>>>Cheers,
>>>>Shinji.
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>>Sent: Wednesday, 30 March 2011 2:34 PM
>>>>To: Ward, Carleen; Martinez, George
>>>>Cc: 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>>
>>>>Hi Carleen,
>>>>
>>>>On top of the DOY092 block that I am requesting, could you extend
>the
>>>>following DSS-45 block to the end of the following free block?
>>>>
>>>>093/1150-1550 DSS-45 GBRA
>>>>->
>>>>093/1150-2220 DSS-45 GBRA
>>>>
>>>>Thanks!
>>>>Shinji.
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>>>>Sent: Wednesday, 30 March 2011 9:44 AM
>>>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Hi Shinji,
>>>>
>>>>Thanks for this.
>>>>Once Carleen okays it I'll revise the schedule.
>>>>
>>>>Cheers,
>>>>Phil
>>>>________________________________________
>>>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji [shoriuchi_at_cdscc.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov]
>>>>Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 9:00 AM
>>>>To: Edwards, Phil (CASS, Marsfield); Ward, Carleen
>>>>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>>Teresa
>>>O
>>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>>
>>>>Hi Carleen,
>>>>
>>>>We have got DOY 92/0615-1445 DSS-34 GBRA block scheduled for LBA
>>>>session, and I have just found the following gap is useful to extend
>>>the
>>>>fraction of coverage for this 24 hour VLBI experiment:
>>>>
>>>>092/1535-1910 DSS-34
>>>>
>>>>Could you please schedule this for GBRA as well? Because the
>>>>interruption is less than an hour, we can just keep backend as it is
>>>>running in background while DSS-34 is taken for Geotail tracking.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks and regards,
>>>>Shinji.
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>>>>Sent: Tuesday, 25 January 2011 8:08 AM
>>>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; Ward, Carleen
>>>>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>>Teresa
>>>O
>>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Thanks, Shinji.
>>>>I'll start planning for that LBA session after the TAC meeting next
>>>>week.
>>>>
>>>>Cheers,
>>>>Phil
>>>>
>>>>________________________________________
>>>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji [shoriuchi_at_cdscc.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov]
>>>>Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 6:52 AM
>>>>To: Ward, Carleen; Edwards, Phil (CASS, Marsfield)
>>>>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>>Teresa
>>>O
>>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>>
>>>>Hi Phil,
>>>>
>>>>Following the discussion with Carleen, I have confirmed that the
>>>>following blocks have been scheduled for GBRA LBA/TANAMI:
>>>>
>>>>089/0925-1900 DSS43 (no overlap with LBA?)
>>>>
>>>>091/0650-1910 DSS43
>>>>
>>>>092/0615-1445 DSS34 (i.e. single pol, S/X/Ka-bands)
>>>>
>>>>093/0650-1250 DSS43,1150-1550 DSS34 (PC-field system is not
>>available
>>>>due to other VLBI support, i.e. not suited for 'very' fast
>switching)
>>>>
>>>>Regards,
>>>>Shinji.
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>>Sent: Saturday, 22 January 2011 9:56 AM
>>>>To: Ward, Carleen; 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>>>>Cc: 'Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov'; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>>>Teresa
>>>>O
>>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>>
>>>>Hi Carleen,
>>>>
>>>>Yes, DSS-43 would be preferred on DOY 093. Then it would be good if
>>>the
>>>>schedule is started with DSS43 at 0650z, then followed with DSS34,
>>say
>>>>at 1150z allowing reasonable overlap.
>>>>
>>>>Regards,
>>>>Shinji.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Ward, Carleen
>>>>Sent: Sat 1/22/2011 4:24 AM
>>>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>>>>Cc: 'Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov'; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>>>Teresa
>>>>O
>>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>>
>>>>Hi Shinij,
>>>>Yes, unfortunately DSS-43 scheduled a downtime starting on DOY
>>>087-088.
>>>>To accommodate DSS-43 downtime, Cassini moved from DOY 088 TO DOY
>>090.
>>>>
>>>>Question - Would DSS-43 on DOY 093 be preferred. I was under the
>>>>impression GBRA could not be scheduled simultaneous with the RFC CAT
>>>>activities. I may be able to move "PHASE STAB TEST" to another day.
>>>>
>>>>C1 093 0650 0650 1250 1250 DSS-43 DSN PHASE STAB TEST
>>NONE
>>>>2C1
>>>>C2 0650 0735 1220 1250 GBRA TANAMI
>>0037
>>>>1B2
>>>>
>>>>In the meantime, I will go ahead schedule the additional time as you
>>>>requested.
>>>>
>>>>Regards,
>>>>Carleen
>>>>
>>>>THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR EXPORT CONTROL AND IT DOES NOT
>>>>CONTAIN EXPORT CONTROLLED TECHNICAL DATA.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>>Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 8:56 AM
>>>>To: Ward, Carleen; 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>>>>Cc: 'Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov'; Martinez, George
>>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>>
>>>>Hi Carleen and Phil,
>>>>
>>>>I see the DSN schedule around the LBA 2011 session is coming along,
>>>and
>>>>only the following have been scheduled:
>>>>
>>>>089/0925-1900 DSS43 GBRA-TANAMI (no actual overlap with LBA?)
>>>>
>>>>091/0650-1910 DSS43 GBRA-TANAMI
>>>>
>>>>Other than 70m, I can see the following 34m gaps,
>>>>
>>>>092/0615-1445 DSS34
>>>>
>>>>093/0610-1550 DSS45 (during DSS34 Cat XKa, i.e. no PC-field system
>is
>>>>available)
>>>>
>>>>I assume without PC-field system we can still track sources manually
>>>>with timestamps while recording data to the LBA recorder.
>>>>
>>>>Carleen, could you please schedule those DSS34 and DSS45 gaps for
>>GBRA
>>>>TANAMI?
>>>>
>>>>Regards,
>>>>Shinji.
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Ward, Carleen
>>>>Sent: Friday, 17 December 2010 12:28 PM
>>>>To: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au; Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George
>>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>>
>>>>Hi Phil and Shinji,
>>>>Yes, please let me know as soon as possible.
>>>>
>>>>Week 13 has not been negotiated but has been built. I've put in the
>>>>following supports for the March 30th session:
>>>>
>>>>090 1205 1250 2045 2115 DSS-43 GBRA TANAMI 0037
>>>>1B2
>>>>091 0737 0822 2022 2052 DSS-43 GBRA TANAMI 0037
>>>>1B2
>>>>
>>>>Please keep in mind the above mention supports are in the schedule
>>but
>>>>not yet cleared. Due to the holidays, this week will probabliy not
>>be
>>>>negotiated till next month.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>May the joy of Christmas be with you all through the year.
>>>>~carleen
>>>>
>>>>THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR EXPORT CONTROL AND IT DOES NOT
>>>>CONTAIN EXPORT CONTROLLED TECHNICAL DATA.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>>>>Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2010 7:43 PM
>>>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; Ward, Carleen
>>>>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George
>>>>Subject: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Dear Carleen,
>>>>
>>>>Shinji has reminded me I should let you know the dates of our next
>>LBA
>>>>session.
>>>>
>>>>(We have short sessions in Dec, Jan and Feb, but with quite fixed
>>>times,
>>>>and so will
>>>>simply see whether there are any suitable gaps in the DSN schedule
>at
>>>>those times --
>>>>no forward planning is otherwise required.)
>>>>
>>>>The next long session will start on March 30 (DOY 089) and run to
>the
>>>>end of April 4
>>>>(DOY 094). There's a good chance we'll have both X-band and K-band
>>>runs
>>>>for the
>>>>TANAMI project in that time, so any GBRA time that can be reserved
>>for
>>>>those would
>>>>be great.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks again for your help throughout the year, and all the best for
>>>the
>>>>festive season!
>>>>
>>>>Regards,
>>>>Phil
>>>>
>>>>################################################################
>>>>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>>>>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>>>>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>>>>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>>>>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>>>>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>>>business
>>>>partners. The organisations accept no
>>>>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>>>>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>>>>to being transmitted.
>>>>################################################################
>>>>################################################################
>>>>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>>>>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>>>>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>>>>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>>>>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>>>>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>>>business
>>>>partners. The organisations accept no
>>>>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>>>>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>>>>to being transmitted.
>>>>################################################################
>>>>################################################################
>>>>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>>>>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>>>>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>>>>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>>>>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>>>>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>>>business partners. The organisations accept no
>>>>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>>>>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>>>>to being transmitted.
>>>>################################################################
>>>
>>>################################################################
>>>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>>>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>>>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>>>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>>>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>>>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>>business partners. The organisations accept no
>>>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>>>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>>>to being transmitted.
>>>################################################################
>>
>>################################################################
>>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>business partners. The organisations accept no
>>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>>to being transmitted.
>>################################################################
>
>################################################################
>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its business partners. The organisations accept no
>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>to being transmitted.
>################################################################
Received on 2011-04-03 17:59:13
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 17:58:48 +1000
Yes - Shinji good point
I will not really have much time if any before hand to create a new schedule... Just if you track the same source and same setup as v430a all should be good.
Cheers
Chris
On 03/04/2011, at 5:52 PM, Horiuchi, Shinji wrote:
>Hi Chris,
>
>I have just realised that the schedule for the fringe test vc142 prior
>to v430a tonight is still for old one for different experiment (16MHz).
>What are we actually going to do with vc142? Shall we point 3c273 with
>the same setup for v430a (64MHz)?
>
>Cheers,
>Shinji.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2011 7:22 PM
>To: Horiuchi, Shinji
>Cc: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au; c.reynolds_at_curtin.<!--nospam-->edu.au
>Subject: Re: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>
>Hi Shinji
>
>Try:
>
>ftp.atnf.csiro.au:/pub/people/vlbi/v430/v430a/Tid/v430a.vex
>
>(or something like that).
>
>I had to remove Warkworth from this schedule but Tid seems OK.
>
>Just record a single 64 MHz channel in cdisko.
>
>Cheers
>Chris
>
>On 02/04/2011, at 7:15 PM, Horiuchi, Shinji wrote:
>
>>Yes, please!
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>>Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2011 6:35 PM
>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>Subject: Re: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>
>>Do you want me to make up a schedule with Tid - can do it immediately,
>>if you like
>>
>>Cheers
>>Chris
>>
>>On 02/04/2011, at 6:26 PM, Horiuchi, Shinji wrote:
>>
>>>VC142 and V430a at 64MHz for DSS-45.
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>>>Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2011 5:53 PM
>>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>Subject: Re: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>
>>>Hi Shinji
>>>
>>>Which experiment are we talking about....?
>>>
>>>On 02/04/2011, at 5:49 PM, Horiuchi, Shinji wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hi Phil,
>>>>
>>>>As of today I can't see Tid in the schedule file (.vex) etc. Is
>still
>>>>Tid expected?
>>>>
>>>>As I told you before, this would be recorded to LBA-DR without a
>>>>PC-field system for this particular time as it's going to be used
>for
>>>>other project. Assuming Tid is required I will make up a predict
>file
>>>so
>>>>that DSS-34 can point sources without the PC-field system.
>>>>
>>>>Cheers,
>>>>Shinji.
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>>Sent: Friday, 1 April 2011 12:02 PM
>>>>To: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au
>>>>Cc: Cormac Reynolds
>>>>Subject: FW: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>>
>>>>Hi Phil and Cormac,
>>>>
>>>>We have got those additional time scheduled. Let me know when vc142
>>>and
>>>>v430a schedule files are ready.
>>>>
>>>>Cormac, in case v271h proc file doesn't work for DSS-34, can I use
>>>v271g
>>>>one instead?
>>>>
>>>>Cheers,
>>>>Shinji.
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Ward, Carleen
>>>>Sent: Friday, 1 April 2011 10:59 AM
>>>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; Martinez, George
>>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>>
>>>>Shinji,
>>>>You should be able to see these in the schedule now.
>>>>
>>>>Thank you.
>>>>
>>>>Regards,
>>>>Carleen
>>>>
>>>>THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR EXPORT CONTROL AND IT DOES NOT
>>>>CONTAIN EXPORT CONTROLLED TECHNICAL DATA.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>>Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 2:30 PM
>>>>To: Ward, Carleen; Martinez, George
>>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>>
>>>>Carleen,
>>>>
>>>>These do not seem to be in place yet as far as I can see with
>>>ClicTrack.
>>>>Could you check?
>>>>
>>>>Regards,
>>>>Shinji.
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Ward, Carleen
>>>>Sent: Thursday, 31 March 2011 10:36 AM
>>>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; Martinez, George
>>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>>
>>>>Shinji,
>>>>On DOY 092, DSS-34 is only available from 1635-1910. If the station
>>>>allows you to start during the GTL track, that would be between you
>>>and
>>>>the station. I can not schedule GBRA any earlier or it will create
>a
>>>>conflict.
>>>>
>>>>The following supports have been scheduled for you:
>>>>
>>>>092 1635 1635 1910 1910 DSS-34 GBRA TANAMI NONE
>>>>1B2
>>>>
>>>>093 1150 1235 2150 2220 DSS-45 GBRA TANAMI NONE
>>>>1B2
>>>>
>>>>Thank you.
>>>>
>>>>Regards,
>>>>Carleen
>>>>
>>>>THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR EXPORT CONTROL AND IT DOES NOT
>>>>CONTAIN EXPORT CONTROLLED TECHNICAL DATA.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>>Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 4:21 PM
>>>>To: Ward, Carleen; Martinez, George
>>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>>
>>>>Hi Carleen and George,
>>>>
>>>>Any chance to see these blocks that I am requesting (on DOY 92, 93,
>>>and
>>>>94) in the DSN schedule soon?
>>>>
>>>>The DSS-43 TANAMI run last night went very well and I recorded data
>>>for
>>>>nearly 13 hours. Thanks for your scheduling coordination. I returned
>>>the
>>>>70m to maintenance team this morning, anticipating to resume the 24
>>>hour
>>>>schedule whenever they finish the scheduled tasks.
>>>>
>>>>Cheers,
>>>>Shinji.
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>>Sent: Wednesday, 30 March 2011 3:06 PM
>>>>To: Ward, Carleen; Martinez, George
>>>>Cc: 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>>
>>>>Carleen,
>>>>
>>>>Please add also the following small block after GTL,
>>>>
>>>>094/0010-0135 DSS-45 GBRA
>>>>
>>>>Cheers,
>>>>Shinji.
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>>Sent: Wednesday, 30 March 2011 2:34 PM
>>>>To: Ward, Carleen; Martinez, George
>>>>Cc: 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>>
>>>>Hi Carleen,
>>>>
>>>>On top of the DOY092 block that I am requesting, could you extend
>the
>>>>following DSS-45 block to the end of the following free block?
>>>>
>>>>093/1150-1550 DSS-45 GBRA
>>>>->
>>>>093/1150-2220 DSS-45 GBRA
>>>>
>>>>Thanks!
>>>>Shinji.
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>>>>Sent: Wednesday, 30 March 2011 9:44 AM
>>>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Hi Shinji,
>>>>
>>>>Thanks for this.
>>>>Once Carleen okays it I'll revise the schedule.
>>>>
>>>>Cheers,
>>>>Phil
>>>>________________________________________
>>>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji [shoriuchi_at_cdscc.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov]
>>>>Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 9:00 AM
>>>>To: Edwards, Phil (CASS, Marsfield); Ward, Carleen
>>>>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>>Teresa
>>>O
>>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>>
>>>>Hi Carleen,
>>>>
>>>>We have got DOY 92/0615-1445 DSS-34 GBRA block scheduled for LBA
>>>>session, and I have just found the following gap is useful to extend
>>>the
>>>>fraction of coverage for this 24 hour VLBI experiment:
>>>>
>>>>092/1535-1910 DSS-34
>>>>
>>>>Could you please schedule this for GBRA as well? Because the
>>>>interruption is less than an hour, we can just keep backend as it is
>>>>running in background while DSS-34 is taken for Geotail tracking.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks and regards,
>>>>Shinji.
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>>>>Sent: Tuesday, 25 January 2011 8:08 AM
>>>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; Ward, Carleen
>>>>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>>Teresa
>>>O
>>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Thanks, Shinji.
>>>>I'll start planning for that LBA session after the TAC meeting next
>>>>week.
>>>>
>>>>Cheers,
>>>>Phil
>>>>
>>>>________________________________________
>>>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji [shoriuchi_at_cdscc.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov]
>>>>Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 6:52 AM
>>>>To: Ward, Carleen; Edwards, Phil (CASS, Marsfield)
>>>>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>>Teresa
>>>O
>>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>>
>>>>Hi Phil,
>>>>
>>>>Following the discussion with Carleen, I have confirmed that the
>>>>following blocks have been scheduled for GBRA LBA/TANAMI:
>>>>
>>>>089/0925-1900 DSS43 (no overlap with LBA?)
>>>>
>>>>091/0650-1910 DSS43
>>>>
>>>>092/0615-1445 DSS34 (i.e. single pol, S/X/Ka-bands)
>>>>
>>>>093/0650-1250 DSS43,1150-1550 DSS34 (PC-field system is not
>>available
>>>>due to other VLBI support, i.e. not suited for 'very' fast
>switching)
>>>>
>>>>Regards,
>>>>Shinji.
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>>Sent: Saturday, 22 January 2011 9:56 AM
>>>>To: Ward, Carleen; 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>>>>Cc: 'Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov'; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>>>Teresa
>>>>O
>>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>>
>>>>Hi Carleen,
>>>>
>>>>Yes, DSS-43 would be preferred on DOY 093. Then it would be good if
>>>the
>>>>schedule is started with DSS43 at 0650z, then followed with DSS34,
>>say
>>>>at 1150z allowing reasonable overlap.
>>>>
>>>>Regards,
>>>>Shinji.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Ward, Carleen
>>>>Sent: Sat 1/22/2011 4:24 AM
>>>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>>>>Cc: 'Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov'; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>>>Teresa
>>>>O
>>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>>
>>>>Hi Shinij,
>>>>Yes, unfortunately DSS-43 scheduled a downtime starting on DOY
>>>087-088.
>>>>To accommodate DSS-43 downtime, Cassini moved from DOY 088 TO DOY
>>090.
>>>>
>>>>Question - Would DSS-43 on DOY 093 be preferred. I was under the
>>>>impression GBRA could not be scheduled simultaneous with the RFC CAT
>>>>activities. I may be able to move "PHASE STAB TEST" to another day.
>>>>
>>>>C1 093 0650 0650 1250 1250 DSS-43 DSN PHASE STAB TEST
>>NONE
>>>>2C1
>>>>C2 0650 0735 1220 1250 GBRA TANAMI
>>0037
>>>>1B2
>>>>
>>>>In the meantime, I will go ahead schedule the additional time as you
>>>>requested.
>>>>
>>>>Regards,
>>>>Carleen
>>>>
>>>>THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR EXPORT CONTROL AND IT DOES NOT
>>>>CONTAIN EXPORT CONTROLLED TECHNICAL DATA.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>>Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 8:56 AM
>>>>To: Ward, Carleen; 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>>>>Cc: 'Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov'; Martinez, George
>>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>>
>>>>Hi Carleen and Phil,
>>>>
>>>>I see the DSN schedule around the LBA 2011 session is coming along,
>>>and
>>>>only the following have been scheduled:
>>>>
>>>>089/0925-1900 DSS43 GBRA-TANAMI (no actual overlap with LBA?)
>>>>
>>>>091/0650-1910 DSS43 GBRA-TANAMI
>>>>
>>>>Other than 70m, I can see the following 34m gaps,
>>>>
>>>>092/0615-1445 DSS34
>>>>
>>>>093/0610-1550 DSS45 (during DSS34 Cat XKa, i.e. no PC-field system
>is
>>>>available)
>>>>
>>>>I assume without PC-field system we can still track sources manually
>>>>with timestamps while recording data to the LBA recorder.
>>>>
>>>>Carleen, could you please schedule those DSS34 and DSS45 gaps for
>>GBRA
>>>>TANAMI?
>>>>
>>>>Regards,
>>>>Shinji.
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Ward, Carleen
>>>>Sent: Friday, 17 December 2010 12:28 PM
>>>>To: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au; Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George
>>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>>
>>>>Hi Phil and Shinji,
>>>>Yes, please let me know as soon as possible.
>>>>
>>>>Week 13 has not been negotiated but has been built. I've put in the
>>>>following supports for the March 30th session:
>>>>
>>>>090 1205 1250 2045 2115 DSS-43 GBRA TANAMI 0037
>>>>1B2
>>>>091 0737 0822 2022 2052 DSS-43 GBRA TANAMI 0037
>>>>1B2
>>>>
>>>>Please keep in mind the above mention supports are in the schedule
>>but
>>>>not yet cleared. Due to the holidays, this week will probabliy not
>>be
>>>>negotiated till next month.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>May the joy of Christmas be with you all through the year.
>>>>~carleen
>>>>
>>>>THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR EXPORT CONTROL AND IT DOES NOT
>>>>CONTAIN EXPORT CONTROLLED TECHNICAL DATA.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>>>>Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2010 7:43 PM
>>>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; Ward, Carleen
>>>>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George
>>>>Subject: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Dear Carleen,
>>>>
>>>>Shinji has reminded me I should let you know the dates of our next
>>LBA
>>>>session.
>>>>
>>>>(We have short sessions in Dec, Jan and Feb, but with quite fixed
>>>times,
>>>>and so will
>>>>simply see whether there are any suitable gaps in the DSN schedule
>at
>>>>those times --
>>>>no forward planning is otherwise required.)
>>>>
>>>>The next long session will start on March 30 (DOY 089) and run to
>the
>>>>end of April 4
>>>>(DOY 094). There's a good chance we'll have both X-band and K-band
>>>runs
>>>>for the
>>>>TANAMI project in that time, so any GBRA time that can be reserved
>>for
>>>>those would
>>>>be great.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks again for your help throughout the year, and all the best for
>>>the
>>>>festive season!
>>>>
>>>>Regards,
>>>>Phil
>>>>
>>>>################################################################
>>>>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>>>>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>>>>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>>>>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>>>>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>>>>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>>>business
>>>>partners. The organisations accept no
>>>>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>>>>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>>>>to being transmitted.
>>>>################################################################
>>>>################################################################
>>>>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>>>>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>>>>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>>>>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>>>>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>>>>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>>>business
>>>>partners. The organisations accept no
>>>>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>>>>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>>>>to being transmitted.
>>>>################################################################
>>>>################################################################
>>>>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>>>>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>>>>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>>>>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>>>>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>>>>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>>>business partners. The organisations accept no
>>>>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>>>>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>>>>to being transmitted.
>>>>################################################################
>>>
>>>################################################################
>>>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>>>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>>>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>>>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>>>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>>>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>>business partners. The organisations accept no
>>>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>>>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>>>to being transmitted.
>>>################################################################
>>
>>################################################################
>>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>business partners. The organisations accept no
>>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>>to being transmitted.
>>################################################################
>
>################################################################
>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its business partners. The organisations accept no
>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>to being transmitted.
>################################################################
Received on 2011-04-03 17:59:13