Re: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: <Chris.Phillips_at_email.protected>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 18:25:35 +1000
No chance of including Ww......
On 03/04/2011, at 6:17 PM, Cormac Reynolds wrote:
>the new schedule for vc142 is there now. It does not include
>Warkworth, but I think it will be difficult to include Warkworth in
>the fringe test with their incompatible 16 MHz mode anyway.
>
>cheers,
>Cormac
>
>On 3 April 2011 15:59, Cormac Reynolds <c.reynolds_at_curtin.<!--nospam-->edu.au> wrote:
>>sorry guys, I forgot to update that one. I'll do it now - will only
>>take a few mins.
>>
>>
>>On 3 April 2011 15:58, <Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au> wrote:
>>>Yes - Shinji good point
>>>
>>>I will not really have much time if any before hand to create a new schedule... Just if you track the same source and same setup as v430a all should be good.
>>>
>>>Cheers
>>>Chris
>>>
>>>On 03/04/2011, at 5:52 PM, Horiuchi, Shinji wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hi Chris,
>>>>
>>>>I have just realised that the schedule for the fringe test vc142 prior
>>>>to v430a tonight is still for old one for different experiment (16MHz).
>>>>What are we actually going to do with vc142? Shall we point 3c273 with
>>>>the same setup for v430a (64MHz)?
>>>>
>>>>Cheers,
>>>>Shinji.
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>>>>Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2011 7:22 PM
>>>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>>Cc: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au; c.reynolds_at_curtin.<!--nospam-->edu.au
>>>>Subject: Re: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>>
>>>>Hi Shinji
>>>>
>>>>Try:
>>>>
>>>>ftp.atnf.csiro.au:/pub/people/vlbi/v430/v430a/Tid/v430a.vex
>>>>
>>>>(or something like that).
>>>>
>>>>I had to remove Warkworth from this schedule but Tid seems OK.
>>>>
>>>>Just record a single 64 MHz channel in cdisko.
>>>>
>>>>Cheers
>>>>Chris
>>>>
>>>>On 02/04/2011, at 7:15 PM, Horiuchi, Shinji wrote:
>>>>
>Yes, please!
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2011 6:35 PM
>To: Horiuchi, Shinji
>Subject: Re: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>
>Do you want me to make up a schedule with Tid - can do it immediately,
>if you like
>
>Cheers
>Chris
>
>On 02/04/2011, at 6:26 PM, Horiuchi, Shinji wrote:
>
>>VC142 and V430a at 64MHz for DSS-45.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>>Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2011 5:53 PM
>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>Subject: Re: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>
>>Hi Shinji
>>
>>Which experiment are we talking about....?
>>
>>On 02/04/2011, at 5:49 PM, Horiuchi, Shinji wrote:
>>
>>>Hi Phil,
>>>
>>>As of today I can't see Tid in the schedule file (.vex) etc. Is
>>>>still
>>>Tid expected?
>>>
>>>As I told you before, this would be recorded to LBA-DR without a
>>>PC-field system for this particular time as it's going to be used
>>>>for
>>>other project. Assuming Tid is required I will make up a predict
>>>>file
>>so
>>>that DSS-34 can point sources without the PC-field system.
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>Shinji.
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>Sent: Friday, 1 April 2011 12:02 PM
>>>To: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au
>>>Cc: Cormac Reynolds
>>>Subject: FW: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>
>>>Hi Phil and Cormac,
>>>
>>>We have got those additional time scheduled. Let me know when vc142
>>and
>>>v430a schedule files are ready.
>>>
>>>Cormac, in case v271h proc file doesn't work for DSS-34, can I use
>>v271g
>>>one instead?
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>Shinji.
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Ward, Carleen
>>>Sent: Friday, 1 April 2011 10:59 AM
>>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; Martinez, George
>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>
>>>Shinji,
>>>You should be able to see these in the schedule now.
>>>
>>>Thank you.
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Carleen
>>>
>>>THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR EXPORT CONTROL AND IT DOES NOT
>>>CONTAIN EXPORT CONTROLLED TECHNICAL DATA.
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 2:30 PM
>>>To: Ward, Carleen; Martinez, George
>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>
>>>Carleen,
>>>
>>>These do not seem to be in place yet as far as I can see with
>>ClicTrack.
>>>Could you check?
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Shinji.
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Ward, Carleen
>>>Sent: Thursday, 31 March 2011 10:36 AM
>>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; Martinez, George
>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>
>>>Shinji,
>>>On DOY 092, DSS-34 is only available from 1635-1910. If the station
>>>allows you to start during the GTL track, that would be between you
>>and
>>>the station. I can not schedule GBRA any earlier or it will create
>>>>a
>>>conflict.
>>>
>>>The following supports have been scheduled for you:
>>>
>>>092 1635 1635 1910 1910 DSS-34 GBRA TANAMI NONE
>>>1B2
>>>
>>>093 1150 1235 2150 2220 DSS-45 GBRA TANAMI NONE
>>>1B2
>>>
>>>Thank you.
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Carleen
>>>
>>>THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR EXPORT CONTROL AND IT DOES NOT
>>>CONTAIN EXPORT CONTROLLED TECHNICAL DATA.
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 4:21 PM
>>>To: Ward, Carleen; Martinez, George
>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>
>>>Hi Carleen and George,
>>>
>>>Any chance to see these blocks that I am requesting (on DOY 92, 93,
>>and
>>>94) in the DSN schedule soon?
>>>
>>>The DSS-43 TANAMI run last night went very well and I recorded data
>>for
>>>nearly 13 hours. Thanks for your scheduling coordination. I returned
>>the
>>>70m to maintenance team this morning, anticipating to resume the 24
>>hour
>>>schedule whenever they finish the scheduled tasks.
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>Shinji.
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>Sent: Wednesday, 30 March 2011 3:06 PM
>>>To: Ward, Carleen; Martinez, George
>>>Cc: 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>
>>>Carleen,
>>>
>>>Please add also the following small block after GTL,
>>>
>>>094/0010-0135 DSS-45 GBRA
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>Shinji.
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>Sent: Wednesday, 30 March 2011 2:34 PM
>>>To: Ward, Carleen; Martinez, George
>>>Cc: 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>
>>>Hi Carleen,
>>>
>>>On top of the DOY092 block that I am requesting, could you extend
>>>>the
>>>following DSS-45 block to the end of the following free block?
>>>
>>>093/1150-1550 DSS-45 GBRA
>>>->
>>>093/1150-2220 DSS-45 GBRA
>>>
>>>Thanks!
>>>Shinji.
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>>>Sent: Wednesday, 30 March 2011 9:44 AM
>>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>
>>>
>>>Hi Shinji,
>>>
>>>Thanks for this.
>>>Once Carleen okays it I'll revise the schedule.
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>Phil
>>>________________________________________
>>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji [shoriuchi_at_cdscc.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov]
>>>Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 9:00 AM
>>>To: Edwards, Phil (CASS, Marsfield); Ward, Carleen
>>>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>Teresa
>>O
>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>
>>>Hi Carleen,
>>>
>>>We have got DOY 92/0615-1445 DSS-34 GBRA block scheduled for LBA
>>>session, and I have just found the following gap is useful to extend
>>the
>>>fraction of coverage for this 24 hour VLBI experiment:
>>>
>>>092/1535-1910 DSS-34
>>>
>>>Could you please schedule this for GBRA as well? Because the
>>>interruption is less than an hour, we can just keep backend as it is
>>>running in background while DSS-34 is taken for Geotail tracking.
>>>
>>>Thanks and regards,
>>>Shinji.
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>>>Sent: Tuesday, 25 January 2011 8:08 AM
>>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; Ward, Carleen
>>>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>Teresa
>>O
>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>
>>>
>>>Thanks, Shinji.
>>>I'll start planning for that LBA session after the TAC meeting next
>>>week.
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>Phil
>>>
>>>________________________________________
>>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji [shoriuchi_at_cdscc.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov]
>>>Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 6:52 AM
>>>To: Ward, Carleen; Edwards, Phil (CASS, Marsfield)
>>>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>Teresa
>>O
>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>
>>>Hi Phil,
>>>
>>>Following the discussion with Carleen, I have confirmed that the
>>>following blocks have been scheduled for GBRA LBA/TANAMI:
>>>
>>>089/0925-1900 DSS43 (no overlap with LBA?)
>>>
>>>091/0650-1910 DSS43
>>>
>>>092/0615-1445 DSS34 (i.e. single pol, S/X/Ka-bands)
>>>
>>>093/0650-1250 DSS43,1150-1550 DSS34 (PC-field system is not
>available
>>>due to other VLBI support, i.e. not suited for 'very' fast
>>>>switching)
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Shinji.
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>Sent: Saturday, 22 January 2011 9:56 AM
>>>To: Ward, Carleen; 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>>>Cc: 'Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov'; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>>Teresa
>>>O
>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>
>>>Hi Carleen,
>>>
>>>Yes, DSS-43 would be preferred on DOY 093. Then it would be good if
>>the
>>>schedule is started with DSS43 at 0650z, then followed with DSS34,
>say
>>>at 1150z allowing reasonable overlap.
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Shinji.
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Ward, Carleen
>>>Sent: Sat 1/22/2011 4:24 AM
>>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>>>Cc: 'Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov'; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>>Teresa
>>>O
>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>
>>>Hi Shinij,
>>>Yes, unfortunately DSS-43 scheduled a downtime starting on DOY
>>087-088.
>>>To accommodate DSS-43 downtime, Cassini moved from DOY 088 TO DOY
>090.
>>>
>>>Question - Would DSS-43 on DOY 093 be preferred. I was under the
>>>impression GBRA could not be scheduled simultaneous with the RFC CAT
>>>activities. I may be able to move "PHASE STAB TEST" to another day.
>>>
>>>C1 093 0650 0650 1250 1250 DSS-43 DSN PHASE STAB TEST
>NONE
>>>2C1
>>>C2 0650 0735 1220 1250 GBRA TANAMI
>0037
>>>1B2
>>>
>>>In the meantime, I will go ahead schedule the additional time as you
>>>requested.
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Carleen
>>>
>>>THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR EXPORT CONTROL AND IT DOES NOT
>>>CONTAIN EXPORT CONTROLLED TECHNICAL DATA.
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 8:56 AM
>>>To: Ward, Carleen; 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>>>Cc: 'Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov'; Martinez, George
>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>
>>>Hi Carleen and Phil,
>>>
>>>I see the DSN schedule around the LBA 2011 session is coming along,
>>and
>>>only the following have been scheduled:
>>>
>>>089/0925-1900 DSS43 GBRA-TANAMI (no actual overlap with LBA?)
>>>
>>>091/0650-1910 DSS43 GBRA-TANAMI
>>>
>>>Other than 70m, I can see the following 34m gaps,
>>>
>>>092/0615-1445 DSS34
>>>
>>>093/0610-1550 DSS45 (during DSS34 Cat XKa, i.e. no PC-field system
>>>>is
>>>available)
>>>
>>>I assume without PC-field system we can still track sources manually
>>>with timestamps while recording data to the LBA recorder.
>>>
>>>Carleen, could you please schedule those DSS34 and DSS45 gaps for
>GBRA
>>>TANAMI?
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Shinji.
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Ward, Carleen
>>>Sent: Friday, 17 December 2010 12:28 PM
>>>To: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au; Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George
>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>
>>>Hi Phil and Shinji,
>>>Yes, please let me know as soon as possible.
>>>
>>>Week 13 has not been negotiated but has been built. I've put in the
>>>following supports for the March 30th session:
>>>
>>>090 1205 1250 2045 2115 DSS-43 GBRA TANAMI 0037
>>>1B2
>>>091 0737 0822 2022 2052 DSS-43 GBRA TANAMI 0037
>>>1B2
>>>
>>>Please keep in mind the above mention supports are in the schedule
>but
>>>not yet cleared. Due to the holidays, this week will probabliy not
>be
>>>negotiated till next month.
>>>
>>>
>>>May the joy of Christmas be with you all through the year.
>>>~carleen
>>>
>>>THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR EXPORT CONTROL AND IT DOES NOT
>>>CONTAIN EXPORT CONTROLLED TECHNICAL DATA.
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>>>Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2010 7:43 PM
>>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; Ward, Carleen
>>>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George
>>>Subject: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>
>>>
>>>Dear Carleen,
>>>
>>>Shinji has reminded me I should let you know the dates of our next
>LBA
>>>session.
>>>
>>>(We have short sessions in Dec, Jan and Feb, but with quite fixed
>>times,
>>>and so will
>>>simply see whether there are any suitable gaps in the DSN schedule
>>>>at
>>>those times --
>>>no forward planning is otherwise required.)
>>>
>>>The next long session will start on March 30 (DOY 089) and run to
>>>>the
>>>end of April 4
>>>(DOY 094). There's a good chance we'll have both X-band and K-band
>>runs
>>>for the
>>>TANAMI project in that time, so any GBRA time that can be reserved
>for
>>>those would
>>>be great.
>>>
>>>Thanks again for your help throughout the year, and all the best for
>>the
>>>festive season!
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Phil
>>>
>>>################################################################
>>>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>>>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>>>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>>>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>>>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>>>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>>business
>>>partners. The organisations accept no
>>>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>>>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>>>to being transmitted.
>>>################################################################
>>>################################################################
>>>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>>>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>>>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>>>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>>>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>>>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>>business
>>>partners. The organisations accept no
>>>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>>>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>>>to being transmitted.
>>>################################################################
>>>################################################################
>>>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>>>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>>>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>>>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>>>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>>>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>>business partners. The organisations accept no
>>>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>>>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>>>to being transmitted.
>>>################################################################
>>
>>################################################################
>>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>business partners. The organisations accept no
>>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>>to being transmitted.
>>################################################################
>
>################################################################
>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>>>>business partners. The organisations accept no
>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>to being transmitted.
>################################################################
>>>>
>>>>################################################################
>>>>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>>>>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>>>>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>>>>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>>>>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>>>>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its business partners. The organisations accept no
>>>>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>>>>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>>>>to being transmitted.
>>>>################################################################
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>----------------------------------------------------
>>Cormac Reynolds
>>Phone: +61 8 9266 3785
>>Fax: +61 8 9266 9246
>>email: c.reynolds_at_curtin.<!--nospam-->edu.au
>>----------------------------------------------------
>>
>
>
>
>--
>----------------------------------------------------
>Cormac Reynolds
>Phone: +61 8 9266 3785
>Fax: +61 8 9266 9246
>email: c.reynolds_at_curtin.<!--nospam-->edu.au
>----------------------------------------------------
Received on 2011-04-03 18:26:05
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 18:25:35 +1000
No chance of including Ww......
On 03/04/2011, at 6:17 PM, Cormac Reynolds wrote:
>the new schedule for vc142 is there now. It does not include
>Warkworth, but I think it will be difficult to include Warkworth in
>the fringe test with their incompatible 16 MHz mode anyway.
>
>cheers,
>Cormac
>
>On 3 April 2011 15:59, Cormac Reynolds <c.reynolds_at_curtin.<!--nospam-->edu.au> wrote:
>>sorry guys, I forgot to update that one. I'll do it now - will only
>>take a few mins.
>>
>>
>>On 3 April 2011 15:58, <Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au> wrote:
>>>Yes - Shinji good point
>>>
>>>I will not really have much time if any before hand to create a new schedule... Just if you track the same source and same setup as v430a all should be good.
>>>
>>>Cheers
>>>Chris
>>>
>>>On 03/04/2011, at 5:52 PM, Horiuchi, Shinji wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hi Chris,
>>>>
>>>>I have just realised that the schedule for the fringe test vc142 prior
>>>>to v430a tonight is still for old one for different experiment (16MHz).
>>>>What are we actually going to do with vc142? Shall we point 3c273 with
>>>>the same setup for v430a (64MHz)?
>>>>
>>>>Cheers,
>>>>Shinji.
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>>>>Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2011 7:22 PM
>>>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>>Cc: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au; c.reynolds_at_curtin.<!--nospam-->edu.au
>>>>Subject: Re: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>>
>>>>Hi Shinji
>>>>
>>>>Try:
>>>>
>>>>ftp.atnf.csiro.au:/pub/people/vlbi/v430/v430a/Tid/v430a.vex
>>>>
>>>>(or something like that).
>>>>
>>>>I had to remove Warkworth from this schedule but Tid seems OK.
>>>>
>>>>Just record a single 64 MHz channel in cdisko.
>>>>
>>>>Cheers
>>>>Chris
>>>>
>>>>On 02/04/2011, at 7:15 PM, Horiuchi, Shinji wrote:
>>>>
>Yes, please!
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2011 6:35 PM
>To: Horiuchi, Shinji
>Subject: Re: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>
>Do you want me to make up a schedule with Tid - can do it immediately,
>if you like
>
>Cheers
>Chris
>
>On 02/04/2011, at 6:26 PM, Horiuchi, Shinji wrote:
>
>>VC142 and V430a at 64MHz for DSS-45.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>>Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2011 5:53 PM
>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>Subject: Re: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>
>>Hi Shinji
>>
>>Which experiment are we talking about....?
>>
>>On 02/04/2011, at 5:49 PM, Horiuchi, Shinji wrote:
>>
>>>Hi Phil,
>>>
>>>As of today I can't see Tid in the schedule file (.vex) etc. Is
>>>>still
>>>Tid expected?
>>>
>>>As I told you before, this would be recorded to LBA-DR without a
>>>PC-field system for this particular time as it's going to be used
>>>>for
>>>other project. Assuming Tid is required I will make up a predict
>>>>file
>>so
>>>that DSS-34 can point sources without the PC-field system.
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>Shinji.
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>Sent: Friday, 1 April 2011 12:02 PM
>>>To: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au
>>>Cc: Cormac Reynolds
>>>Subject: FW: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>
>>>Hi Phil and Cormac,
>>>
>>>We have got those additional time scheduled. Let me know when vc142
>>and
>>>v430a schedule files are ready.
>>>
>>>Cormac, in case v271h proc file doesn't work for DSS-34, can I use
>>v271g
>>>one instead?
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>Shinji.
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Ward, Carleen
>>>Sent: Friday, 1 April 2011 10:59 AM
>>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; Martinez, George
>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>
>>>Shinji,
>>>You should be able to see these in the schedule now.
>>>
>>>Thank you.
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Carleen
>>>
>>>THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR EXPORT CONTROL AND IT DOES NOT
>>>CONTAIN EXPORT CONTROLLED TECHNICAL DATA.
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 2:30 PM
>>>To: Ward, Carleen; Martinez, George
>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>
>>>Carleen,
>>>
>>>These do not seem to be in place yet as far as I can see with
>>ClicTrack.
>>>Could you check?
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Shinji.
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Ward, Carleen
>>>Sent: Thursday, 31 March 2011 10:36 AM
>>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; Martinez, George
>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>
>>>Shinji,
>>>On DOY 092, DSS-34 is only available from 1635-1910. If the station
>>>allows you to start during the GTL track, that would be between you
>>and
>>>the station. I can not schedule GBRA any earlier or it will create
>>>>a
>>>conflict.
>>>
>>>The following supports have been scheduled for you:
>>>
>>>092 1635 1635 1910 1910 DSS-34 GBRA TANAMI NONE
>>>1B2
>>>
>>>093 1150 1235 2150 2220 DSS-45 GBRA TANAMI NONE
>>>1B2
>>>
>>>Thank you.
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Carleen
>>>
>>>THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR EXPORT CONTROL AND IT DOES NOT
>>>CONTAIN EXPORT CONTROLLED TECHNICAL DATA.
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 4:21 PM
>>>To: Ward, Carleen; Martinez, George
>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>
>>>Hi Carleen and George,
>>>
>>>Any chance to see these blocks that I am requesting (on DOY 92, 93,
>>and
>>>94) in the DSN schedule soon?
>>>
>>>The DSS-43 TANAMI run last night went very well and I recorded data
>>for
>>>nearly 13 hours. Thanks for your scheduling coordination. I returned
>>the
>>>70m to maintenance team this morning, anticipating to resume the 24
>>hour
>>>schedule whenever they finish the scheduled tasks.
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>Shinji.
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>Sent: Wednesday, 30 March 2011 3:06 PM
>>>To: Ward, Carleen; Martinez, George
>>>Cc: 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>
>>>Carleen,
>>>
>>>Please add also the following small block after GTL,
>>>
>>>094/0010-0135 DSS-45 GBRA
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>Shinji.
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>Sent: Wednesday, 30 March 2011 2:34 PM
>>>To: Ward, Carleen; Martinez, George
>>>Cc: 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>
>>>Hi Carleen,
>>>
>>>On top of the DOY092 block that I am requesting, could you extend
>>>>the
>>>following DSS-45 block to the end of the following free block?
>>>
>>>093/1150-1550 DSS-45 GBRA
>>>->
>>>093/1150-2220 DSS-45 GBRA
>>>
>>>Thanks!
>>>Shinji.
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>>>Sent: Wednesday, 30 March 2011 9:44 AM
>>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>
>>>
>>>Hi Shinji,
>>>
>>>Thanks for this.
>>>Once Carleen okays it I'll revise the schedule.
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>Phil
>>>________________________________________
>>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji [shoriuchi_at_cdscc.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov]
>>>Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 9:00 AM
>>>To: Edwards, Phil (CASS, Marsfield); Ward, Carleen
>>>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>Teresa
>>O
>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>
>>>Hi Carleen,
>>>
>>>We have got DOY 92/0615-1445 DSS-34 GBRA block scheduled for LBA
>>>session, and I have just found the following gap is useful to extend
>>the
>>>fraction of coverage for this 24 hour VLBI experiment:
>>>
>>>092/1535-1910 DSS-34
>>>
>>>Could you please schedule this for GBRA as well? Because the
>>>interruption is less than an hour, we can just keep backend as it is
>>>running in background while DSS-34 is taken for Geotail tracking.
>>>
>>>Thanks and regards,
>>>Shinji.
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>>>Sent: Tuesday, 25 January 2011 8:08 AM
>>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; Ward, Carleen
>>>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>Teresa
>>O
>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>
>>>
>>>Thanks, Shinji.
>>>I'll start planning for that LBA session after the TAC meeting next
>>>week.
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>Phil
>>>
>>>________________________________________
>>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji [shoriuchi_at_cdscc.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov]
>>>Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 6:52 AM
>>>To: Ward, Carleen; Edwards, Phil (CASS, Marsfield)
>>>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>Teresa
>>O
>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>
>>>Hi Phil,
>>>
>>>Following the discussion with Carleen, I have confirmed that the
>>>following blocks have been scheduled for GBRA LBA/TANAMI:
>>>
>>>089/0925-1900 DSS43 (no overlap with LBA?)
>>>
>>>091/0650-1910 DSS43
>>>
>>>092/0615-1445 DSS34 (i.e. single pol, S/X/Ka-bands)
>>>
>>>093/0650-1250 DSS43,1150-1550 DSS34 (PC-field system is not
>available
>>>due to other VLBI support, i.e. not suited for 'very' fast
>>>>switching)
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Shinji.
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>Sent: Saturday, 22 January 2011 9:56 AM
>>>To: Ward, Carleen; 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>>>Cc: 'Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov'; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>>Teresa
>>>O
>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>
>>>Hi Carleen,
>>>
>>>Yes, DSS-43 would be preferred on DOY 093. Then it would be good if
>>the
>>>schedule is started with DSS43 at 0650z, then followed with DSS34,
>say
>>>at 1150z allowing reasonable overlap.
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Shinji.
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Ward, Carleen
>>>Sent: Sat 1/22/2011 4:24 AM
>>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>>>Cc: 'Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov'; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>>Teresa
>>>O
>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>
>>>Hi Shinij,
>>>Yes, unfortunately DSS-43 scheduled a downtime starting on DOY
>>087-088.
>>>To accommodate DSS-43 downtime, Cassini moved from DOY 088 TO DOY
>090.
>>>
>>>Question - Would DSS-43 on DOY 093 be preferred. I was under the
>>>impression GBRA could not be scheduled simultaneous with the RFC CAT
>>>activities. I may be able to move "PHASE STAB TEST" to another day.
>>>
>>>C1 093 0650 0650 1250 1250 DSS-43 DSN PHASE STAB TEST
>NONE
>>>2C1
>>>C2 0650 0735 1220 1250 GBRA TANAMI
>0037
>>>1B2
>>>
>>>In the meantime, I will go ahead schedule the additional time as you
>>>requested.
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Carleen
>>>
>>>THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR EXPORT CONTROL AND IT DOES NOT
>>>CONTAIN EXPORT CONTROLLED TECHNICAL DATA.
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 8:56 AM
>>>To: Ward, Carleen; 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>>>Cc: 'Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov'; Martinez, George
>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>
>>>Hi Carleen and Phil,
>>>
>>>I see the DSN schedule around the LBA 2011 session is coming along,
>>and
>>>only the following have been scheduled:
>>>
>>>089/0925-1900 DSS43 GBRA-TANAMI (no actual overlap with LBA?)
>>>
>>>091/0650-1910 DSS43 GBRA-TANAMI
>>>
>>>Other than 70m, I can see the following 34m gaps,
>>>
>>>092/0615-1445 DSS34
>>>
>>>093/0610-1550 DSS45 (during DSS34 Cat XKa, i.e. no PC-field system
>>>>is
>>>available)
>>>
>>>I assume without PC-field system we can still track sources manually
>>>with timestamps while recording data to the LBA recorder.
>>>
>>>Carleen, could you please schedule those DSS34 and DSS45 gaps for
>GBRA
>>>TANAMI?
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Shinji.
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Ward, Carleen
>>>Sent: Friday, 17 December 2010 12:28 PM
>>>To: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au; Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George
>>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>
>>>Hi Phil and Shinji,
>>>Yes, please let me know as soon as possible.
>>>
>>>Week 13 has not been negotiated but has been built. I've put in the
>>>following supports for the March 30th session:
>>>
>>>090 1205 1250 2045 2115 DSS-43 GBRA TANAMI 0037
>>>1B2
>>>091 0737 0822 2022 2052 DSS-43 GBRA TANAMI 0037
>>>1B2
>>>
>>>Please keep in mind the above mention supports are in the schedule
>but
>>>not yet cleared. Due to the holidays, this week will probabliy not
>be
>>>negotiated till next month.
>>>
>>>
>>>May the joy of Christmas be with you all through the year.
>>>~carleen
>>>
>>>THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR EXPORT CONTROL AND IT DOES NOT
>>>CONTAIN EXPORT CONTROLLED TECHNICAL DATA.
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>>>Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2010 7:43 PM
>>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; Ward, Carleen
>>>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George
>>>Subject: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>
>>>
>>>Dear Carleen,
>>>
>>>Shinji has reminded me I should let you know the dates of our next
>LBA
>>>session.
>>>
>>>(We have short sessions in Dec, Jan and Feb, but with quite fixed
>>times,
>>>and so will
>>>simply see whether there are any suitable gaps in the DSN schedule
>>>>at
>>>those times --
>>>no forward planning is otherwise required.)
>>>
>>>The next long session will start on March 30 (DOY 089) and run to
>>>>the
>>>end of April 4
>>>(DOY 094). There's a good chance we'll have both X-band and K-band
>>runs
>>>for the
>>>TANAMI project in that time, so any GBRA time that can be reserved
>for
>>>those would
>>>be great.
>>>
>>>Thanks again for your help throughout the year, and all the best for
>>the
>>>festive season!
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Phil
>>>
>>>################################################################
>>>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>>>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>>>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>>>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>>>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>>>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>>business
>>>partners. The organisations accept no
>>>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>>>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>>>to being transmitted.
>>>################################################################
>>>################################################################
>>>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>>>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>>>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>>>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>>>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>>>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>>business
>>>partners. The organisations accept no
>>>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>>>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>>>to being transmitted.
>>>################################################################
>>>################################################################
>>>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>>>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>>>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>>>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>>>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>>>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>>business partners. The organisations accept no
>>>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>>>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>>>to being transmitted.
>>>################################################################
>>
>>################################################################
>>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>business partners. The organisations accept no
>>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>>to being transmitted.
>>################################################################
>
>################################################################
>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>>>>business partners. The organisations accept no
>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>to being transmitted.
>################################################################
>>>>
>>>>################################################################
>>>>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>>>>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>>>>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>>>>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>>>>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>>>>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its business partners. The organisations accept no
>>>>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>>>>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>>>>to being transmitted.
>>>>################################################################
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>----------------------------------------------------
>>Cormac Reynolds
>>Phone: +61 8 9266 3785
>>Fax: +61 8 9266 9246
>>email: c.reynolds_at_curtin.<!--nospam-->edu.au
>>----------------------------------------------------
>>
>
>
>
>--
>----------------------------------------------------
>Cormac Reynolds
>Phone: +61 8 9266 3785
>Fax: +61 8 9266 9246
>email: c.reynolds_at_curtin.<!--nospam-->edu.au
>----------------------------------------------------
Received on 2011-04-03 18:26:05