Re: V1.3 of LBA schedule now on-line
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: Jonathan Quick <jon_at_email.protected>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 06:56:42 +0200 (SAST)
Hi Phil/Cormac
On Wed, August 14, 2013 4:40 am, Philip.Edwards_at_email.protected
> A revised version of the LBA block schedule is now on-line at
> http://www.atnf.csiro.au/vlbi/schedules/lba/2013apr.html
>
> V1.3 differs only in the extension of v486b from 11:00 to 15:00,
> displacing vt10r. This extension formally includes the triggered
> LBA NAPA proposal V447, but which is being included in the
> revised V486b schedule for simplicity.
I presume this change is already reflected in v486b.vex version 2.0000?
NB: v486b.vex (both versions) still appears to trip up DRUDG in FS 9.11.3
resulting in a bad 'mk5b_mode=ext,0x0000FFFF,0' command, though I've not seen
this with any of the other schedules this session. We need to establish
whether there is a real fault in the VEX or whether we should be reporting
this to John/Ed.
Regards
Jon
Received on 2013-08-14 14:56:55
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 06:56:42 +0200 (SAST)
Hi Phil/Cormac
On Wed, August 14, 2013 4:40 am, Philip.Edwards_at_email.protected
> A revised version of the LBA block schedule is now on-line at
> http://www.atnf.csiro.au/vlbi/schedules/lba/2013apr.html
>
> V1.3 differs only in the extension of v486b from 11:00 to 15:00,
> displacing vt10r. This extension formally includes the triggered
> LBA NAPA proposal V447, but which is being included in the
> revised V486b schedule for simplicity.
I presume this change is already reflected in v486b.vex version 2.0000?
NB: v486b.vex (both versions) still appears to trip up DRUDG in FS 9.11.3
resulting in a bad 'mk5b_mode=ext,0x0000FFFF,0' command, though I've not seen
this with any of the other schedules this session. We need to establish
whether there is a real fault in the VEX or whether we should be reporting
this to John/Ed.
Regards
Jon
Received on 2013-08-14 14:56:55