The pulse periods of AXPs increase with time (Mereghetti, Israel &
Stella 1998). If the associated loss of rotational energy is
attributed solely to magnetic dipole radiation, the inferred surface
field is
Tesla, whence
T for typical AXP parameters:
s and
(corresponding to 3 ms/year). This is much
stronger than the inferred fields for `normal' (
T) and
millisecond pulsars (
T). The idea that their strong
magnetic field may be the defining characteristic of AXPs has led to
them being referred to as `magnetars' (Thompson & Duncan 1993).
More specifically, a magnetar is a neutron star whose surface field
exceeds the critical field strength
T at
which the energy corresponding to the cyclotron frequency
equals the electron rest energy
.
Electric fields of energy densities exceeding that of the
critical field decay spontaneously via electron-positron pair
creation. Magnetic fields which exceed
cannot decay in
this way because of kinematic restrictions -- the process of pair
creation would violate momentum conservation.
The strong inferred fields of magnetars may arise in one of two ways.
Usov (1992) has shown that the if the strong magnetic fields
associated with some white dwarf stars are frozen in when they
collapse as Type 1a supernovae, then neutron star fields of 107 T
may result. Duncan & Thompson (1992) have shown that dynamo action
could generate the inferred fields.
The energy loss rates,
where I is the moment
of inertia, for normal and millisecond pulsars are much higher than
the observed radiation luminosities, and these objects are thought to
be rotation powered. In contrast, the spin-down luminosity of a
neutron star with
s and
is
4 x
1025 W, much less than the observed X-ray luminosities of AXPs.
It is therefore thought that AXP emission is not powered by rotation,
but rather by the decay of their strong magnetic fields.
Some the eight known AXPs are associated with supernova remnants and
some with Soft Gamma-ray Repeaters (SGRs). There is some evidence
that the AXPs associated with SGRs have the strongest inferred
magnetic fields. The idea that a strong neutron star magnetic field
suppresses radio emission has recently been placed on a more firm
theoretical foundation by Baring and Harding (1998), invoking
suppression of electron-positron pair formation due to increased
photon splitting.
The best known SGR was the source of the 5 March 1979 event which
attained a luminosity of 1037 J and had a clear 8.1 s
periodicity. It is believed to be associated with a supernova
remnant, N49, in the Large Magellanic Cloud. A specific model for
this object involves the release of magnetic energy through fractures
of the neutron star crust (Thompson & Duncan 1995).
In a supercritical magnetic field the cross section for the scattering
of radiation with frequencies well below the gyrofrequency is highly
anisotropic. In particular, scattering of the extraordinary mode is
strongly suppressed with respect to that of radiation in the ordinary
mode. The consequences of this effect are subtle: it allows
extraordinary mode emission to escape even from close to the neutron
star, and it clearly affects the interpretation of the Eddington
`limit' for accretion powered sources.
The Parkes Multibeam Pulsar Survey (Lyne et al., 1999), which has a
flux sensitivity of 150
Jy and is seven times more sensitive than
any previous survey, may double the number of radio pulsars from the
750 known before it began. It has already discovered 362 new pulsars,
including PSR J1814-17 which has a period of around 4 s and a high
which places it in the part of
-space occupied by
AXPs. The AXP 1904+09, which has P=5.16 s,
,
and which is associated with
SGR1900+14, has recently been claimed as a radio pulsar (Shitov
1999).
AXP/SGR/SNR associations, and the relationship between magnetic field
strength and radio emission, may ultimately shed light on the apparent
deficiency of radio pulsars that are associated with supernova
remnants.
The collapse of a star and the resulting supernova explosion that
produces a neutron star depends on neutrinos to revive the shock and
eject the outer layers of the star (Bethe & Wilson 1985). Four
neutrino flavours are necessary to explain all known neutrino
anomalies, but only three ordinary neutrinos are allowed. Yvonne
Wong (University of Melbourne) is investigating the possibility that
the fourth flavour may arise through oscillations into `sterile'
neutrinos - which do not participate in weak interactions as ordinary
neutrinos do. The physics of such oscillations, in matter rather than
in vacuo, has important implications for the understanding of
supernova shocks (Nunokawa et al. 1997).
Roberto Soria (ANU/SRCfTA) and Amy Mioduszewski (SRCfTA)
discussed observations of the sources GRS J1655-40 and CI Cam which
have answered some questions and raised others. Optical spectra of
GRS J1655-40 display both broad lines in absorption and emission
(
), and emission lines which are narrower
than the minimum allowed if they originate in an accretion disk. This
can be explained if the system is a black hole binary, and the narrow
lines originate in an extended envelope surrounding the disk. The
nature of the source CI Cam remains a mystery. It has been classified
as a symbiotic star and as a Herbig B object. It is a bright
emission-line star which exhibited a single uncomplicated X-ray
brightening on 1 April 1998, detected by RXTE and CGRO/BATSE,
brightening from
to
Crabs in less than 1 day and
then slowly decaying. An associated optical brightening by 2
magnitudes was recorded (Fontera et al. 1998). A radio flare was
detected with the VLBA on day 1 and then at intervals of a few
days. The images, with a resolution of just a few AU show a
slowly-expanding synchrotron shell, with a speed of just
,
and no evidence of the jet-like collimated outflows seen
in all other soft X-ray transient-related radio transients observed
with sufficient resolution.