User Tools

Site Tools


difx:difx-sfxc_comparison

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
difx:difx-sfxc_comparison [2015/11/19 14:35]
adamdeller
difx:difx-sfxc_comparison [2015/11/19 14:35]
adamdeller
Line 59: Line 59:
 | Hanning window + overlap, zero padded, averaged 4x in freq | 17.37 | 15.94           | | Hanning window + overlap, zero padded, averaged 4x in freq | 17.37 | 15.94           |
  
-So as you can see, the S/N estimated locally is always pretty comparable, even though the S/N estimated globally is 35% higher with a windowed overlap.+So as you can see, the S/N estimated locally is always pretty comparable, even though the S/N estimated globally is 35% higher with a windowed overlap.  Zero padding does help a little, but at the level of 2-3%.
  
difx/difx-sfxc_comparison.txt · Last modified: 2015/11/20 15:44 by adamdeller