This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
correlator:records:v255b [2009/04/06 15:23] – aquib | correlator:records:v255b [2009/05/13 16:49] – aquib | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
The two masers are strong and so should be visible at frequencies of 6668.3 and 6667.4 MHz for G9.62 and G8.68 respectively (with the first about a factor of 30 or more stronger than the second). | The two masers are strong and so should be visible at frequencies of 6668.3 and 6667.4 MHz for G9.62 and G8.68 respectively (with the first about a factor of 30 or more stronger than the second). | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Output files:** | ||
+ | ^ File name ^ Description | ||
+ | | 1. v255b.0215-0557.rpf | UT time range 0215-0557. 4 IFs, 1 pol, 256 chans per 16 MHz IF | | ||
+ | | 2. v255b.1436-1524.rpf | UT time range 1436-1524. 4 IFs, 1 pol, 256 chans per 16 MHz IF | | ||
+ | | 3. v255b.G8.68.rpf | ||
+ | | 4. v255b.G9.62.rpf | ||
+ | | 5. v255b.1105-1120.fullres.rpf | ||
+ | | 6. v255b.0557.ctm.rpf | ||
+ | | 7. v255b.1524.ctm.rpf | ||
===== Analysis notes and links to plots ===== | ===== Analysis notes and links to plots ===== | ||
- | [[ftp:// | + | **Verified by: Aquib** |
+ | |||
+ | **Date: May 13, 2009** | ||
+ | |||
+ | **File-1: | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[ftp:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[ftp:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[ftp:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[ftp:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[ftp:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Comments: The data looks Ok** | ||
+ | |||
+ | **File-2: | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[ftp:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[ftp:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[ftp:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Comments: Bandpass looks alright** | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[ftp:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[ftp:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Comments: Ceduna data lost after 14:36UT due to error in correlation** | ||
+ | |||
+ | **File-3: | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[ftp:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[ftp:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[ftp:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Comments: The bandpass plots require some further analysis** | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[ftp:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[ftp:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | **File-4: | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[ftp:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[ftp:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[ftp:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Comments: Parkes autocorrelation bandpass looks unusual** | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[ftp:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[ftp:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | **File-6: | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[ftp:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[ftp:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[ftp:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[ftp:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[ftp:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | **File-7: | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[ftp:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[ftp:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[ftp:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Comments: There seems to be an unusual dip in Parkes bandpass? | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[ftp:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Comments: Zero amplitude for some of the baselines e.g. Pks - Cd, Pks - Ho and some others** | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[ftp:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Comments: Same dip observed in baselines to Parkes** | ||
+ | |||
+ |