User Tools

Site Tools


correlator:records:v255b

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
correlator:records:v255b [2009/04/06 15:23]
aquib
correlator:records:v255b [2014/11/11 18:08] (current)
Line 14: Line 14:
  
 The two masers are strong and so should be visible at frequencies of 6668.3 and 6667.4 MHz for G9.62 and G8.68 respectively (with the first about a factor of 30 or more stronger than the second). The two masers are strong and so should be visible at frequencies of 6668.3 and 6667.4 MHz for G9.62 and G8.68 respectively (with the first about a factor of 30 or more stronger than the second).
 +
 +**Output files:**
 +^ File name  ^ Description 
 +| 1. v255b.0215-0557.rpf | UT time range 0215-0557. 4 IFs, 1 pol, 256 chans per 16 MHz IF |
 +| 2. v255b.1436-1524.rpf | UT time range 1436-1524. 4 IFs, 1 pol, 256 chans per 16 MHz IF |
 +| 3. v255b.G8.68.rpf     | 1st maser target: dual pol, 2048 channels across 6667-6669 MHz |
 +| 4. v255b.G9.62.rpf     | 2nd maser target: dual pol, 2048 channels across 6667-6669 MHz |
 +| 5. v255b.1105-1120.fullres.rpf  | 15 mins on calibrators with 2048 channels across 6667-6669 MHz |
 +| 6. v255b.0557.ctm.rpf  | 2 IFs (IF3, IF4) dual pol, 256 chans per 16 MHz IF (all sources incl. maser targets)|
 +| 7. v255b.1524.ctm.rpf  | 2 IFs (IF3,IF4) dual pol, 256 chans per 16 MHz IF |
  
 ===== Analysis notes and links to plots ===== ===== Analysis notes and links to plots =====
  
-[[ftp://cira.ivec.org/v275a/v275a.DTSUM.txt|Brief Data Summary]]+**Verified by: Aquib** 
 + 
 +**Date: May 13, 2009** 
 + 
 +**File-1:** 
 + 
 +[[http://cira.ivec.org/pipeline/v255b/v255b-1.dtsum.txt|Data Summary]] 
 + 
 +[[http://cira.ivec.org/pipeline/v255b/v255b-1.scan.txt|Scan Listing]] 
 + 
 +[[http://cira.ivec.org/pipeline/v255b/v255b-1_possm_autocorr.pdf|Autocorrelation plots]] 
 + 
 +[[http://cira.ivec.org/pipeline/v255b/v255b-1_vplot_uncal.pdf|Amplitude and Phase against time]] 
 + 
 +[[http://cira.ivec.org/pipeline/v255b/v255b-1_possm_uncal.pdf|Amplitude and Phase against frequency]] 
 + 
 +**Comments: The data looks Ok** 
 + 
 +**File-2:** 
 + 
 +[[http://cira.ivec.org/pipeline/v255b/v255b-2.dtsum.txt|Data Summary]] 
 + 
 +[[http://cira.ivec.org/pipeline/v255b/v255b-2.scan.txt|Scan Listing]] 
 + 
 +[[http://cira.ivec.org/pipeline/v255b/v255b-2_possm_autocorr.pdf|Autocorrelation plots]] 
 + 
 +**Comments: Bandpass looks alright** 
 + 
 +[[http://cira.ivec.org/pipeline/v255b/v255b-2_vplot_uncal.pdf|Amplitude and Phase against time]] 
 + 
 +[[http://cira.ivec.org/pipeline/v255b/v255b-2_possm_uncal.pdf|Amplitude and Phase against frequency]] 
 + 
 +**Comments: Ceduna data lost after 14:36UT due to error in correlation** 
 + 
 +**File-3:** 
 + 
 +[[http://cira.ivec.org/pipeline/v255b/v255b-3.dtsum.txt|Data Summary]] 
 + 
 +[[http://cira.ivec.org/pipeline/v255b/v255b-3.scan.txt|Scan Listing]] 
 + 
 +[[http://cira.ivec.org/pipeline/v255b/v255b-3_possm_autocorr.pdf|Autocorrelation plots]] 
 + 
 +**Comments: The bandpass plots require some further analysis** 
 + 
 +[[http://cira.ivec.org/pipeline/v255b/v255b-3_vplot_uncal.pdf|Amplitude and Phase against time]] 
 + 
 +[[http://cira.ivec.org/pipeline/v255b/v255b-3_possm_uncal.pdf|Amplitude and Phase against frequency]] 
 + 
 +**File-4:** 
 + 
 +[[http://cira.ivec.org/pipeline/v255b/v255b-4.dtsum.txt|Data Summary]] 
 + 
 +[[http://cira.ivec.org/pipeline/v255b/v255b-4.scan.txt|Scan Listing]] 
 + 
 +[[http://cira.ivec.org/pipeline/v255b/v255b-4_possm_autocorr.pdf|Autocorrelation plots]] 
 + 
 +**Comments: Parkes autocorrelation bandpass looks unusual** 
 + 
 +[[http://cira.ivec.org/pipeline/v255b/v255b-4_vplot_uncal.pdf|Amplitude and Phase against time]] 
 + 
 +[[http://cira.ivec.org/pipeline/v255b/v255b-4_possm_uncal.pdf|Amplitude and Phase against frequency]] 
 + 
 + 
 +**File-6:** 
 + 
 +[[http://cira.ivec.org/pipeline/v255b/v255b-6.dtsum.txt|Data Summary]] 
 + 
 +[[http://cira.ivec.org/pipeline/v255b/v255b-6.scan.txt|Scan Listing]] 
 + 
 +[[http://cira.ivec.org/pipeline/v255b/v255b-6_possm_autocorr.pdf|Autocorrelation plots]] 
 + 
 +[[http://cira.ivec.org/pipeline/v255b/v255b-6_vplot_uncal.pdf|Amplitude and Phase against time]] 
 + 
 +[[http://cira.ivec.org/pipeline/v255b/v255b-6_possm_uncal.pdf|Amplitude and Phase against frequency]] 
 + 
 +[[http://cira.ivec.org/pipeline/v255b/v255b_fring_delay.pdf|Fringe-fit delay solutions]] 
 + 
 +[[http://cira.ivec.org/pipeline/v255b/v255b_fring_phase.pdf|Fringe-fit phase solutions]] 
 + 
 +[[http://cira.ivec.org/pipeline/v255b/v255b_fring_rate.pdf|Fringe-fit rate solutions]] 
 + 
 +[[http://cira.ivec.org/pipeline/v255b/v255b_possm_fring.pdf|Plots of Amplitude and Phase against frequency with fringe-fitted solutions applied]] 
 + 
 +[[http://cira.ivec.org/pipeline/v255b/v255b_vplot_fring.pdf|Plots of Amplitude and Phase against time with fringe-fitted solutions applied]] 
 + 
 + 
 + 
 +**File-7:** 
 + 
 +[[http://cira.ivec.org/pipeline/v255b/v255b-7.dtsum.txt|Data Summary]] 
 + 
 +[[http://cira.ivec.org/pipeline/v255b/v255b-7.scan.txt|Scan Listing]] 
 + 
 +[[http://cira.ivec.org/pipeline/v255b/v255b-7_possm_autocorr.pdf|Autocorrelation plots]] 
 + 
 +**Comments: There seems to be an unusual dip in Parkes bandpass?** 
 + 
 +[[http://cira.ivec.org/pipeline/v255b/v255b-7_vplot_uncal.pdf|Amplitude and Phase against time]] 
 + 
 +**Comments: Zero amplitude for some of the baselines e.g. Pks - Cd, Pks - Ho and some others** 
 + 
 +[[http://cira.ivec.org/pipeline/v255b/v255b-7_possm_uncal.pdf|Amplitude and Phase against frequency]] 
 + 
 +**Comments: Same dip observed in baselines to Parkes** 
 + 
 + 
correlator/records/v255b.1238995416.txt.gz · Last modified: 2009/04/06 15:23 by aquib