User Tools

Site Tools


lbaops:lbaapr2016:s16rd01datlog

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
lbaops:lbaapr2016:s16rd01datlog [2016/04/18 19:52]
ste616
lbaops:lbaapr2016:s16rd01datlog [2016/04/19 01:03] (current)
ste616
Line 18: Line 18:
  
 Shortly before the beginning of the experiment I did a pointing on 3C273 at 7mm. Other pointing scans were performed at (all times show when the main schedule was stopped to the time when it was back on source on main schedule): Shortly before the beginning of the experiment I did a pointing on 3C273 at 7mm. Other pointing scans were performed at (all times show when the main schedule was stopped to the time when it was back on source on main schedule):
 +
 +10:29:30 - 10:44:40, on 1252+119.
 +
 +11:51:00 - 12:04:20, on 1212+171.
 +
 +13:25:30 - 13:39:10, on M84.
 +
 +14:49:30 - 15:02:50, on 3C273.
  
 Condition reports: Condition reports:
Line 28: Line 36:
  
 Antenna 1 seems to be drifting around in phase compared to the other antennas. In fact, CA05 looks much more stable when compared to CA02 and CA03, so I've changed the tied array from 123 to 235. Antenna 1 seems to be drifting around in phase compared to the other antennas. In fact, CA05 looks much more stable when compared to CA02 and CA03, so I've changed the tied array from 123 to 235.
 +
 +10:44 UTC:
 +
 +Still lovely seeing, at around 50 microns now! No change to the tied array for now though, still not sure about CA01.
 +
 +12:04 UTC:
 +
 +Seeing up over 150 microns now, but the 3mm tied array 235 still looks good.
 +
 +13:40 UTC:
 +
 +Seeing hovering around 100 microns.
 +
 +13:45 UTC:
 +
 +When back on 3C273, the phases are moving quite rapidly now. I've had to drop the 3mm tied array back to just CA02,CA03.
 +
lbaops/lbaapr2016/s16rd01datlog.1460973128.txt.gz · Last modified: 2016/04/18 19:52 by ste616