This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
lbaops:lbadec2009:vt10i [2005/04/07 08:23] Unknown |
lbaops:lbadec2009:vt10i [2009/12/09 15:20] cehotan |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
^Station Modes | Cd Ho | | ^Station Modes | Cd Ho | | ||
- | ^Channel 1 | '' | + | ^Channel 1 | '' |
- | ^Channel 2 | '' | + | ^Channel 2 | '' |
- | ^DAS 1 Skyfreq | + | ^DAS 1 Skyfreq |
- | ^Bandwidth | + | ^Bandwidth |
- | ^DAS Mode | + | ^DAS Mode |
Ftp: [[ftp:// | Ftp: [[ftp:// | ||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
===== Comments: ===== | ===== Comments: ===== | ||
- | Cd Ho: Note the use of the dual sideband vsop profile. Only the lower sideband | + | This is a 64 MHz bandwidth experiment. Please make sure that the BG3 cable is used to connect |
+ | |||
+ | Please note that this is NOT a fringe test, we need to keep the raw data and ship it back to Curtin. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Chris tells me that we cannot flip the 64 MHz band in the DAS. I think this means that the Hobart and Ceduna bands might be flipped with respect to each other, but we should be able to fix this during correlation. For reference, fauto shows that the Ceduna band is recorded with higher frequencies in smaller channel numbers. | ||
===== Observing comments for each antenna: ===== | ===== Observing comments for each antenna: ===== |