Re: v156f1 & v162c1T
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: <jim.lovell_at_email.protected>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 10:09:56 +1100
Hi Richard,
RE v162c1:
>Normal Tid freqs (Please confirm -- that is LCP and 1634 MHz - would
>1650 be preferred?)
I'd prefer 1650 +/- 16 MHz. There's a fair bit of interference in the
low end of the band. Is that OK with everyone else?
Cheers,
Jim
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 10:09:56 +1100
Hi Richard,
RE v162c1:
>Normal Tid freqs (Please confirm -- that is LCP and 1634 MHz - would
>1650 be preferred?)
I'd prefer 1650 +/- 16 MHz. There's a fair bit of interference in the
low end of the band. Is that OK with everyone else?
Cheers,
Jim
-- Jim Lovell, Jim.Lovell_at_csiro.au ATNF c/o RSAA, Mt Stromlo Observatory, Ph: (02) 6125 6715 Cotter Road, Weston ACT 2611 Fax: (02) 6125 0233 Australia Mobile: 0412 127364 http://www.atnf.csiro.au/people/Jim.Lovell At Tidbinbilla Ph (02) 6201 7842 (RA Lab), x7800 (switch), x7940(shift)Received on 2004-11-11 10:10:28