Re: vt17a
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: <Chris.Phillips_at_email.protected>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 09:55:58 +1100
I need 512 Mbps during vt17a.....
Cheers
Chris
On 01/04/2011, at 9:53 AM, Jim Lovell wrote:
>Hi Chris,
>
>I don’t think it would be a problem at Hobart to do 6.7 instead of 8.4 GHz.
>
>I would like to do some eTransfer of 12m IVS data over the weekend though. Can we share the network or do you need all we’ve got?
>
>Cheers,
>Jim
>
>
>On 31/03/2011, at 8:22 PM, Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au wrote:
>
>>Hi Guys
>>
>>The test experiment on Sunday (vt17a) was scheduled for 8 GHz. It turns out that is a MAJOR pain at Parkes as it is 64 MHz and Parkes has some funky setup issues at 8 GHz.
>>
>>I propose changing this to 6.7 GHz, a similar setup to the v255n (but single frequency not the split freq).
>>
>>This should not be an issue with Mp/At
>>
>>Does this cause problems with Hobart? We can drop Hobart in necessary, but I would prefer to keep it for eVLBI practice.
>>
>>Cheers
>>Chris
>
Received on 2011-04-01 09:56:20
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 09:55:58 +1100
I need 512 Mbps during vt17a.....
Cheers
Chris
On 01/04/2011, at 9:53 AM, Jim Lovell wrote:
>Hi Chris,
>
>I don’t think it would be a problem at Hobart to do 6.7 instead of 8.4 GHz.
>
>I would like to do some eTransfer of 12m IVS data over the weekend though. Can we share the network or do you need all we’ve got?
>
>Cheers,
>Jim
>
>
>On 31/03/2011, at 8:22 PM, Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au wrote:
>
>>Hi Guys
>>
>>The test experiment on Sunday (vt17a) was scheduled for 8 GHz. It turns out that is a MAJOR pain at Parkes as it is 64 MHz and Parkes has some funky setup issues at 8 GHz.
>>
>>I propose changing this to 6.7 GHz, a similar setup to the v255n (but single frequency not the split freq).
>>
>>This should not be an issue with Mp/At
>>
>>Does this cause problems with Hobart? We can drop Hobart in necessary, but I would prefer to keep it for eVLBI practice.
>>
>>Cheers
>>Chris
>
Received on 2011-04-01 09:56:20