|
Next Section: Comparison with Observations Title/Abstract Page: Investigating Pulse Morphology in Previous Section: Introduction | Contents Page: Volume 15, Number 2 |
It has been shown (Kirk, Melrose and Peters, 1984, Melrose and Kirk 1986, Kirk and Melrose, 1986, Bussard et al. 1986) that the most important source of continuum photons (i.e. photons not near the cyclotron frequency) in X-ray pulsars of low to moderate luminosity is from two-photon cyclotron emission and the associated double compton scattering. In two-photon cyclotron emission an excited electron in an n=1 quantum state returns to the ground state by emitting two photons, the sum of whose frequency roughly equals the cyclotron frequency. The rate of two-photon cyclotron emission is highest when one photon has a frequency close to the cyclotron frequency and the other photon frequency is much lower. Kirk, Nagel and Storey (1986) calculated the X-ray emission intensity and resulting beam shapes for two-photon cyclotron emission for conditions existing in typical X-ray pulsars. The model applies to pulsars for which the frequencies observed are significantly less than the cyclotron frequency.
The observational and theoretical evidence that GX 1+4 has an unusually high magnetic field (implying that existing observations are at frequencies well below the cyclotron frequency) means that GX 1+4 is an ideal object for studying two-photon cyclotron emission. The Kirk, Nagel and Storey (1986) model calculations were compared with balloon observations of GX 1+4 (Greenhill et al. 1993) and it was shown that the model is consistent with the observed pulse shape up to energies of order 75 keV. The observed pulse at high frequencies was narrower than predicted by the two-photon cyclotron emission model alone, possibly due to resonant Compton scattering of X-ray photons by the accretion plasma above the emission region, or increased non-resonant Compton scattering (Greenhill et al. 1993).
The ASCA satellite observed GX 1+4 at energies between 3 and 10 keV. Compton scattering is less significant at frequencies far below the cyclotron frequency (Pavlov, Shibanov and Meszaros 1989) and so for the ASCA observations the observed pulse should correspond more exactly to the theoretically predicted pulse shape.
In the
highly magnetized emission region plasma the X-ray radiation is
emitted in two natural modes and, in general, the natural modes are
elliptically polarized. However, at frequencies well below the
cyclotron frequency the modes can be approximated as having transverse
linear polarization (Melrose and Kirk, 1986, hereafter MK86) with
polarization vectors, indicating the polarization direction of the
two natural modes of radiation, given by
![]()
The angle
is the polar angle of emission of the photon with
respect to the magnetic field and the angle
is the azimuthal
angle of the photon with respect to the magnetic field. The magnetic
field B is in the z direction. The derivation of the transition
rates for two-photon cyclotron emission in such a plasma, averaged over
polarization and angle of emission is given in
MK86. For the densities present in accretion streams (
m
), vaccuum
polarization effects dominate plasma effects. An analysis of radiative transfer effects
has been given in Kirk, Nagel and Storey (1986). The effect of radiative transfer through
the emission region is not included in the calculation below.
The transverse polarization
approximation is valid at very low frequencies compared to the
cyclotron frequency and so applies to the ASCA observations of GX 1+4
if the pulsar has a cyclotron frequency
. For
two-photon cyclotron emission the probability of a soft photon of
frequency
being emitted in polarization mode
, as a function of the frequencies and angles of
emission of the two photons, and
, the velocity of the emitting electron along B, is given by

where
, the
are matrix elements
(MK86),
is the wavevector of the emitted low frequency photon
in the
z direction and
m is the mass of the electron. Units where h=c=1 are used throughout except where
explicitly stated otherwise. Variables
and
refer to the second higher energy photon. The delta function
approximation is discussed in Kirk, Nagel and Storey (1986) (see equation
(3) of that paper).
In MK86 (36 a to d) expressions are given for the squares of the projected matrix elements, averaged over the azimuthal angles of the photons, and also averaged over the forward and backward directions, with respect to the magnetic field, of polar angles of the photons.
The results for the projected matrix elements are used to construct
the transition probabilities for emission of a low frequency photon in
either polarization mode as a function of its frequency
and
, the angle of emission with respect to the magnetic
field. This is done by integrating over the frequency of the second
photon using the delta function and averaging over the direction of
emission with respect to the magnetic field of the second photon. In
the low frequency limit, only the leading terms in
need to be considered. Then the rate of emission
of a soft photon of frequency
has an angular dependence
given by (after correcting some errors in the equations for the matrix
elements in MK86)
![]()
![]()
where
, superscript t
indicates emission in the t polarization mode and superscript a
indicates emission in the a polarization mode. For soft photons
with
emission in the t polarization mode dominates and the
angular pattern for
goes as
. For
terms in
become important, and thus
the equations above indicate that a change in polarization direction
could be observed across a pulse. The sum of
and
leads
to the total transition probability, independent of polarization.
Two-photon emission has been shown to be the dominant source of emission for moderate luminosity X-ray pulsars (Kirk and Melrose 1986). For such pulsars the deceleration region of the accretion plasma is thought to occur close to the surface of the star and the emission region is modelled as a thin slab of plasma on the polar cap of the neutron star (Kirk 1985).
The flux from the emission region F has an angular
dependence given by
![]()
where the factor of
takes into account
the projected area of the slab. If the slab were radiating
isotropically the pulse profile would have the form
.
|
Next Section: Comparison with Observations Title/Abstract Page: Investigating Pulse Morphology in Previous Section: Introduction | Contents Page: Volume 15, Number 2 |