Minutes, ca-forum #10

 

date:  thursday 29 june, 1995;  11:00 -> 12:30

 

 

agenda:

 

1.  DSD (WEW, ML)

 

    -> changes to caobs to make use thereof.

 

2.  System modifications and tests

    (When/how does a task get promoted to at$run).  (mjk)

 

3.  Data Quality observations (NEBK)

 

4.  Mosaicing and environments (mjk)

     

5.  Ref. pointing (DMcK)

 

6.  S-band poln. (NEBK, mjk)

 

7.  Band definitions - eg, observations below 1.2 GHz

 

8.  12 GHz Holography (mjk)

 

    -> Need for remote focus control - at least manual in control room, with

    readout.

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

1.  Digital Synchronous Demodulators.

 

The unit has been modified to provide separate pre-scalers for the

ON and OFF;  this seems to have cured the earlier noise problems.

Tests now show the digital units superior to the analogue units

by the expected factor of two or so.

 

New problem:  the ACC prescaler factors need to be reduced by a factor of 4.

 

** Dave McC will attend to this next week. (3-7 july).

 

 

CAOBS modifications:

 

The routine to compute Tsys needs to be modified to read the DSDs.

CAOBS will support either mode ... user choice via SET DSD or SET ANALOGUE

in CAOBS, with DSD.  The choice will be persistent,

so that CAOBS will start up with the setting it had on exit.  The choice

will be visible in the SHOW TCAL page.  An alternative might be to

reset to DSD whenever the project ID changes.

(should there be a "reset to factory defaults" switch in CAOBS ? )

 

** MJK will look to this by mid-week. 

 

 

2.  System modifications.

 

We should formalise the process of modifying and checking out on-line

software.  The narrabri group will look into this.  Discussed briefly

was the idea that a modification should be preceded by a

note describing the details along with a list of check-out tests. 

This would be sent to Dave Mc.C.

 

3.  Data Quality Observations.

 

NEBK has produced a set of Miriad scripts to process the observations.

These were checked out last week.  The procedure is not entirely

automatic .. any data editing will need to be done by hand.

 

Three fields are processed in each RF band - 1934-638 (or 0823-500)

on boresight; offset by a few synthesized beams; and a near by empty field.

 

First impressions:

 

      - dynamic ranges of 5000 - 10000 were easily achieved;

      - but low level artefacts were present, particularly at L-band.

      - 1934 has some weak companions at L-band (~10-20 mJy, at 900").

 

The plan is to have a folder which will accumulate the results.

 

At this stage it is not clear what form the archiving should take - ie,

which plots/figures/tables should be kept on hand for future reference;

 

** Narrabri will experiment over the next few data quality observations to

get a feel for the useful items.

 

 

Additional point:  given that many potential calibrators, including

1934-638, give trouble at L-band, we should look to producing a database

of these calibrators.  The analysis tasks (eg, Miriad) would be able to

access this so as to render these sources useful as calibrators.

 

** JER to look to this.

 

 

4.  Mosaicing.

 

MJK made some small changes to the environment machinery to address

the "first field" problem with the CenA mosaic.  The tests were inconclusive.

 

There are also some reports that the machinery now starts the pattern before

the antennas are on-source.  Some checks are desirable.

 

The scheme to allocate a different environment to each field in the

mosaic is still limited to 20 fields (after which the environments

are re-cycled).  The advertised limit (128) is on hold until the

narrabri group are able to do the major re-compilation of all the software

that uses the global common.  This may not occur before august.

 

 

5.  Reference pointing.

 

This is now available to friendly experts.

 

The scheme is invoked by setting the scantype to RPOINT.

 

The scheme is still evolving -

 

      - it needs a check on the reasonableness of the solution, and

the ability to reject bad solutions.

 

      - the validity range (in time/azimuth/elevation) needs to be

explored.

 

      - user control over the implementation: can the reference solution

be accepted/rejected on a scan-by-scan basis?  Should the solution

automatically be cleared with change in project ID ? (This is not

relevant if the user must explicitly request the reference solution

with each scan).

 

** DMcKay will look to these matters.

 

 

6.  S-band polarisation problems.

 

The problem was outlined briefly last forum.  The results are now a bit

clearer;  the consequences for polarisation work have still to be resolved.

 

- At 2400 MHz we find that the beam patterns are elliptical with an axial

ratio (minor axis/major axis) of 0.95 (X) and 0.91 (Y);  the major

axis (X) is orthogonal to the (Y) major axis;  there is also

some suggestion of a small squint between the beams.

 

The S-band system is not focussed;  indeed, all observations are made

with the subreflector in the optimum C/X position.  Lowering the

subreflector to be as close to the S-band focus as possible improved

the beam shape (much better defined sidelobes), but did not reduce

the minor:major axial ratio.

 

- The Mopra SETI feed showed a similar effect, although the squint was

more pronounced.

 

Polarisation work on extended objects at S-band are therefore

problematic at present.

 

 

6A.  Remote (automatic) control of the focus setting.

 

The hardware is ready;  the software requires a modest amount of

work (1-2 days).  What is lacking is an understanding of the options

and the consequences:

 

-  do we let CAOBS choose the optimum position?

 

-  do we track with elevation?

 

-  do we simply provide a stand-alone task (a_test ?) for experts?

 

 

Some questions:

 

- does the focus setting change with elevation?

 

- does the beam shape vary significantly with focus setting?

 

 

7.  RF. Band definitions.

 

In response to requests from J.Reynolds and Lister Staveley-Smith

the L-band lower limit was set to 1170 MHz.

 

Observations of 1934-638 showed no degradation in performance.

 

Some scope remains for further extension, and could be tested on

request.

 

8.  12 GHz holography.

 

Antenna 6 was surveyed using the Optus B-1 satellite (12.75 GHz).

 

The surface has an rms of ~0.35mm; the system was badly defocussed

(1.5cm movement of the subreflector is required).  a lateral

subreflector shift of ~0.5 cm may be required.  Further observations are

required.

 

The report is numbered AT/39.3/051

 

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------

 

Next meeting:

 

Friday, July 21, at 11:00.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

 

Staff space
Public