Re: C-band problem @ Parkes
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: <rdodson_at_email.protected>
Date: 10 Mar 2005 10:32:24 +0100
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 06:30, John Reynolds wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Phil and Roopesh are happy to go single-polarization on their 4.8GHz
>observations (V180a, v131aw), to work-around the failure of the B-channel
>on the 4.8GHz Rx here at Parkes.
>
>I'm assuming Richard will also be happy with this (v156g1).
>
>Does anyone else (Hobart, Ceduna, Hart) anticipate a problem with this?
>I'm assuming everyone can identify unambiguously which polar is which
>at 4.8GHz, from long practice with VSOP.
>
>Does anyone have a preference for which polarization? My suggestion is to
>make it LCP only, consistent with VSOP practice (and also to use the
>standard VSOP-type DAS profiles).
I will take the one polarisation. Thanks.
Is it possible to run a fringe check on this experimental setup to
confirm the polarisation? This was one of the ideas of the fringe tests
of course. And I am sure it is exactly what you are doing, making this
message redundant.
Richard
Received on 2005-03-10 20:32:51
Date: 10 Mar 2005 10:32:24 +0100
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 06:30, John Reynolds wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Phil and Roopesh are happy to go single-polarization on their 4.8GHz
>observations (V180a, v131aw), to work-around the failure of the B-channel
>on the 4.8GHz Rx here at Parkes.
>
>I'm assuming Richard will also be happy with this (v156g1).
>
>Does anyone else (Hobart, Ceduna, Hart) anticipate a problem with this?
>I'm assuming everyone can identify unambiguously which polar is which
>at 4.8GHz, from long practice with VSOP.
>
>Does anyone have a preference for which polarization? My suggestion is to
>make it LCP only, consistent with VSOP practice (and also to use the
>standard VSOP-type DAS profiles).
I will take the one polarisation. Thanks.
Is it possible to run a fringe check on this experimental setup to
confirm the polarisation? This was one of the ideas of the fringe tests
of course. And I am sure it is exactly what you are doing, making this
message redundant.
Richard
Received on 2005-03-10 20:32:51