For a QSO number count of the form
,
gravitational lensing causes a cross-correlation between galaxies and
QSOs of the form
in the weak lensing regime.
Note, we assume that the intrinsic number count slope is not
significantly modified by the lensing, this is reasonable given the
flat number count slope of the faint QSOs considered here (Hamana,
Martel & Futamase 2000).
is the linear bias of the
foreground galaxies and
is the cross
correlation function between the magnification,
,
and the
density contrast,
.
Bartelmann (1995) has shown (see also
Bartelmann & Schneider 1999) that
is an
integral over the mass power spectrum, P(k), and the radial
distributions of the QSOs and galaxies.
The observed galaxy auto-correlation functions is
.
The mass correlation
function,
,
is an integral over P(k) and the
radial distribution of galaxies (Limber 1953). When we take the ratio
,
to first order the
integrals over the P(k) cancel such that the ratio is constant (to
per cent) as a function of
on scales of interest.
This makes it easy to compare QSO-galaxy cross-correlations to
galaxy-galaxy auto correlations via
![]() |
We assume a
CDM power spectrum,
allowing for non-linear effects using the empirical fits of Peacock &
Dodds (1996). We also assume that
denotes the average
linear bias of the population considered. We use the galaxy redshift
distributions shown in Fig. 1, which are analytic models of
the form
(e.g. Baugh &
Efstathiou 1993), with parameters
and
chosen to
match the redshift distributions found by Glazebrook et al. (1995) at
B<23 (
and
), and
Fernández-Soto, Lanzetta & Yahil (1999) at B<26
(
and
). We note that the exact
form of the redshift distribution make little difference to the
expected lensing amplitude. The above redshift distribution for
B<23 gives
and
0.09 for the EdS and
cosmologies respectively. We use the
Infante & Pritchet (1995) measurement of the auto-correlation
function of B<23 galaxies,
with
in arcmins, to make our comparisons. We fit a -0.8 power law to
the observed
to determine the ratio
and thus derive
via
Eq. 1.
An alternative explanation for a cross-correlation signal is that dust
associated with the foreground galaxies causes extinction in the QSOs,
so that less are found nearby the galaxies. The extinction in the
B-band is
,
with
,
where E(B-V) is
the measured reddening, and
is a function of
the redshift of the absorbing material. At z=0 x(0)=4.0 for
absorption in the B-band. At higher redshift, the observed B-band
is moved into the UV, so that for a given column of dust, the
extinction will be greater. When integrating over the n(z)
distribution for B<23 galaxies the mean value of
for the observed B-band is 5.57. If
then the
cross-correlation due to inter-galactic dust is
,
with
a
function of
.
The amount of dust required depends on the
steepness of the QSO number counts slope.