Re: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: <c.reynolds_at_email.protected>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 15:59:44 +0800
sorry guys, I forgot to update that one. I'll do it now - will only
take a few mins.
On 3 April 2011 15:58, <Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au> wrote:
>Yes - Shinji good point
>
>I will not really have much time if any before hand to create a new schedule... Just if you track the same source and same setup as v430a all should be good.
>
>Cheers
>Chris
>
>On 03/04/2011, at 5:52 PM, Horiuchi, Shinji wrote:
>
>>Hi Chris,
>>
>>I have just realised that the schedule for the fringe test vc142 prior
>>to v430a tonight is still for old one for different experiment (16MHz).
>>What are we actually going to do with vc142? Shall we point 3c273 with
>>the same setup for v430a (64MHz)?
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Shinji.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>>Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2011 7:22 PM
>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>Cc: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au; c.reynolds_at_curtin.<!--nospam-->edu.au
>>Subject: Re: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>
>>Hi Shinji
>>
>>Try:
>>
>>ftp.atnf.csiro.au:/pub/people/vlbi/v430/v430a/Tid/v430a.vex
>>
>>(or something like that).
>>
>>I had to remove Warkworth from this schedule but Tid seems OK.
>>
>>Just record a single 64 MHz channel in cdisko.
>>
>>Cheers
>>Chris
>>
>>On 02/04/2011, at 7:15 PM, Horiuchi, Shinji wrote:
>>
>>>Yes, please!
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>>>Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2011 6:35 PM
>>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>Subject: Re: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>
>>>Do you want me to make up a schedule with Tid - can do it immediately,
>>>if you like
>>>
>>>Cheers
>>>Chris
>>>
>>>On 02/04/2011, at 6:26 PM, Horiuchi, Shinji wrote:
>>>
>>>>VC142 and V430a at 64MHz for DSS-45.
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>>>>Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2011 5:53 PM
>>>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>>Subject: Re: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>>
>>>>Hi Shinji
>>>>
>>>>Which experiment are we talking about....?
>>>>
>>>>On 02/04/2011, at 5:49 PM, Horiuchi, Shinji wrote:
>>>>
>Hi Phil,
>
>As of today I can't see Tid in the schedule file (.vex) etc. Is
>>still
>Tid expected?
>
>As I told you before, this would be recorded to LBA-DR without a
>PC-field system for this particular time as it's going to be used
>>for
>other project. Assuming Tid is required I will make up a predict
>>file
>>>>so
>that DSS-34 can point sources without the PC-field system.
>
>Cheers,
>Shinji.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>Sent: Friday, 1 April 2011 12:02 PM
>To: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au
>Cc: Cormac Reynolds
>Subject: FW: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>
>Hi Phil and Cormac,
>
>We have got those additional time scheduled. Let me know when vc142
>>>>and
>v430a schedule files are ready.
>
>Cormac, in case v271h proc file doesn't work for DSS-34, can I use
>>>>v271g
>one instead?
>
>Cheers,
>Shinji.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ward, Carleen
>Sent: Friday, 1 April 2011 10:59 AM
>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; Martinez, George
>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>
>Shinji,
>You should be able to see these in the schedule now.
>
>Thank you.
>
>Regards,
>Carleen
>
>THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR EXPORT CONTROL AND IT DOES NOT
>CONTAIN EXPORT CONTROLLED TECHNICAL DATA.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 2:30 PM
>To: Ward, Carleen; Martinez, George
>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>
>Carleen,
>
>These do not seem to be in place yet as far as I can see with
>>>>ClicTrack.
>Could you check?
>
>Regards,
>Shinji.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ward, Carleen
>Sent: Thursday, 31 March 2011 10:36 AM
>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; Martinez, George
>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>
>Shinji,
>On DOY 092, DSS-34 is only available from 1635-1910. If the station
>allows you to start during the GTL track, that would be between you
>>>>and
>the station. I can not schedule GBRA any earlier or it will create
>>a
>conflict.
>
>The following supports have been scheduled for you:
>
>092 1635 1635 1910 1910 DSS-34 GBRA TANAMI NONE
>1B2
>
>093 1150 1235 2150 2220 DSS-45 GBRA TANAMI NONE
>1B2
>
>Thank you.
>
>Regards,
>Carleen
>
>THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR EXPORT CONTROL AND IT DOES NOT
>CONTAIN EXPORT CONTROLLED TECHNICAL DATA.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 4:21 PM
>To: Ward, Carleen; Martinez, George
>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>
>Hi Carleen and George,
>
>Any chance to see these blocks that I am requesting (on DOY 92, 93,
>>>>and
>94) in the DSN schedule soon?
>
>The DSS-43 TANAMI run last night went very well and I recorded data
>>>>for
>nearly 13 hours. Thanks for your scheduling coordination. I returned
>>>>the
>70m to maintenance team this morning, anticipating to resume the 24
>>>>hour
>schedule whenever they finish the scheduled tasks.
>
>Cheers,
>Shinji.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>Sent: Wednesday, 30 March 2011 3:06 PM
>To: Ward, Carleen; Martinez, George
>Cc: 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>
>Carleen,
>
>Please add also the following small block after GTL,
>
>094/0010-0135 DSS-45 GBRA
>
>Cheers,
>Shinji.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>Sent: Wednesday, 30 March 2011 2:34 PM
>To: Ward, Carleen; Martinez, George
>Cc: 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>
>Hi Carleen,
>
>On top of the DOY092 block that I am requesting, could you extend
>>the
>following DSS-45 block to the end of the following free block?
>
>093/1150-1550 DSS-45 GBRA
>->
>093/1150-2220 DSS-45 GBRA
>
>Thanks!
>Shinji.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>Sent: Wednesday, 30 March 2011 9:44 AM
>To: Horiuchi, Shinji
>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>
>
>Hi Shinji,
>
>Thanks for this.
>Once Carleen okays it I'll revise the schedule.
>
>Cheers,
>Phil
>________________________________________
>From: Horiuchi, Shinji [shoriuchi_at_cdscc.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov]
>Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 9:00 AM
>To: Edwards, Phil (CASS, Marsfield); Ward, Carleen
>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>>>Teresa
>>>>O
>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>
>Hi Carleen,
>
>We have got DOY 92/0615-1445 DSS-34 GBRA block scheduled for LBA
>session, and I have just found the following gap is useful to extend
>>>>the
>fraction of coverage for this 24 hour VLBI experiment:
>
>092/1535-1910 DSS-34
>
>Could you please schedule this for GBRA as well? Because the
>interruption is less than an hour, we can just keep backend as it is
>running in background while DSS-34 is taken for Geotail tracking.
>
>Thanks and regards,
>Shinji.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>Sent: Tuesday, 25 January 2011 8:08 AM
>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; Ward, Carleen
>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>>>Teresa
>>>>O
>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>
>
>Thanks, Shinji.
>I'll start planning for that LBA session after the TAC meeting next
>week.
>
>Cheers,
>Phil
>
>________________________________________
>From: Horiuchi, Shinji [shoriuchi_at_cdscc.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 6:52 AM
>To: Ward, Carleen; Edwards, Phil (CASS, Marsfield)
>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>>>Teresa
>>>>O
>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>
>Hi Phil,
>
>Following the discussion with Carleen, I have confirmed that the
>following blocks have been scheduled for GBRA LBA/TANAMI:
>
>089/0925-1900 DSS43 (no overlap with LBA?)
>
>091/0650-1910 DSS43
>
>092/0615-1445 DSS34 (i.e. single pol, S/X/Ka-bands)
>
>093/0650-1250 DSS43,1150-1550 DSS34 (PC-field system is not
>>>available
>due to other VLBI support, i.e. not suited for 'very' fast
>>switching)
>
>Regards,
>Shinji.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>Sent: Saturday, 22 January 2011 9:56 AM
>To: Ward, Carleen; 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>Cc: 'Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov'; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>>>>Teresa
>O
>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>
>Hi Carleen,
>
>Yes, DSS-43 would be preferred on DOY 093. Then it would be good if
>>>>the
>schedule is started with DSS43 at 0650z, then followed with DSS34,
>>>say
>at 1150z allowing reasonable overlap.
>
>Regards,
>Shinji.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ward, Carleen
>Sent: Sat 1/22/2011 4:24 AM
>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>Cc: 'Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov'; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>>>>Teresa
>O
>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>
>Hi Shinij,
>Yes, unfortunately DSS-43 scheduled a downtime starting on DOY
>>>>087-088.
>To accommodate DSS-43 downtime, Cassini moved from DOY 088 TO DOY
>>>090.
>
>Question - Would DSS-43 on DOY 093 be preferred. I was under the
>impression GBRA could not be scheduled simultaneous with the RFC CAT
>activities. I may be able to move "PHASE STAB TEST" to another day.
>
>C1 093 0650 0650 1250 1250 DSS-43 DSN PHASE STAB TEST
>>>NONE
>2C1
>C2 0650 0735 1220 1250 GBRA TANAMI
>>>0037
>1B2
>
>In the meantime, I will go ahead schedule the additional time as you
>requested.
>
>Regards,
>Carleen
>
>THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR EXPORT CONTROL AND IT DOES NOT
>CONTAIN EXPORT CONTROLLED TECHNICAL DATA.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 8:56 AM
>To: Ward, Carleen; 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>Cc: 'Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov'; Martinez, George
>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>
>Hi Carleen and Phil,
>
>I see the DSN schedule around the LBA 2011 session is coming along,
>>>>and
>only the following have been scheduled:
>
>089/0925-1900 DSS43 GBRA-TANAMI (no actual overlap with LBA?)
>
>091/0650-1910 DSS43 GBRA-TANAMI
>
>Other than 70m, I can see the following 34m gaps,
>
>092/0615-1445 DSS34
>
>093/0610-1550 DSS45 (during DSS34 Cat XKa, i.e. no PC-field system
>>is
>available)
>
>I assume without PC-field system we can still track sources manually
>with timestamps while recording data to the LBA recorder.
>
>Carleen, could you please schedule those DSS34 and DSS45 gaps for
>>>GBRA
>TANAMI?
>
>Regards,
>Shinji.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ward, Carleen
>Sent: Friday, 17 December 2010 12:28 PM
>To: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au; Horiuchi, Shinji
>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George
>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>
>Hi Phil and Shinji,
>Yes, please let me know as soon as possible.
>
>Week 13 has not been negotiated but has been built. I've put in the
>following supports for the March 30th session:
>
>090 1205 1250 2045 2115 DSS-43 GBRA TANAMI 0037
>1B2
>091 0737 0822 2022 2052 DSS-43 GBRA TANAMI 0037
>1B2
>
>Please keep in mind the above mention supports are in the schedule
>>>but
>not yet cleared. Due to the holidays, this week will probabliy not
>>>be
>negotiated till next month.
>
>
>May the joy of Christmas be with you all through the year.
>~carleen
>
>THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR EXPORT CONTROL AND IT DOES NOT
>CONTAIN EXPORT CONTROLLED TECHNICAL DATA.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2010 7:43 PM
>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; Ward, Carleen
>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George
>Subject: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>
>
>Dear Carleen,
>
>Shinji has reminded me I should let you know the dates of our next
>>>LBA
>session.
>
>(We have short sessions in Dec, Jan and Feb, but with quite fixed
>>>>times,
>and so will
>simply see whether there are any suitable gaps in the DSN schedule
>>at
>those times --
>no forward planning is otherwise required.)
>
>The next long session will start on March 30 (DOY 089) and run to
>>the
>end of April 4
>(DOY 094). There's a good chance we'll have both X-band and K-band
>>>>runs
>for the
>TANAMI project in that time, so any GBRA time that can be reserved
>>>for
>those would
>be great.
>
>Thanks again for your help throughout the year, and all the best for
>>>>the
>festive season!
>
>Regards,
>Phil
>
>################################################################
>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>>>>business
>partners. The organisations accept no
>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>to being transmitted.
>################################################################
>################################################################
>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>>>>business
>partners. The organisations accept no
>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>to being transmitted.
>################################################################
>################################################################
>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>>>>business partners. The organisations accept no
>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>to being transmitted.
>################################################################
>>>>
>>>>################################################################
>>>>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>>>>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>>>>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>>>>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>>>>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>>>>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>>>business partners. The organisations accept no
>>>>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>>>>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>>>>to being transmitted.
>>>>################################################################
>>>
>>>################################################################
>>>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>>>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>>>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>>>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>>>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>>>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>>business partners. The organisations accept no
>>>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>>>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>>>to being transmitted.
>>>################################################################
>>
>>################################################################
>>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its business partners. The organisations accept no
>>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>>to being transmitted.
>>################################################################
>
>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 15:59:44 +0800
sorry guys, I forgot to update that one. I'll do it now - will only
take a few mins.
On 3 April 2011 15:58, <Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au> wrote:
>Yes - Shinji good point
>
>I will not really have much time if any before hand to create a new schedule... Just if you track the same source and same setup as v430a all should be good.
>
>Cheers
>Chris
>
>On 03/04/2011, at 5:52 PM, Horiuchi, Shinji wrote:
>
>>Hi Chris,
>>
>>I have just realised that the schedule for the fringe test vc142 prior
>>to v430a tonight is still for old one for different experiment (16MHz).
>>What are we actually going to do with vc142? Shall we point 3c273 with
>>the same setup for v430a (64MHz)?
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Shinji.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>>Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2011 7:22 PM
>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>Cc: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au; c.reynolds_at_curtin.<!--nospam-->edu.au
>>Subject: Re: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>
>>Hi Shinji
>>
>>Try:
>>
>>ftp.atnf.csiro.au:/pub/people/vlbi/v430/v430a/Tid/v430a.vex
>>
>>(or something like that).
>>
>>I had to remove Warkworth from this schedule but Tid seems OK.
>>
>>Just record a single 64 MHz channel in cdisko.
>>
>>Cheers
>>Chris
>>
>>On 02/04/2011, at 7:15 PM, Horiuchi, Shinji wrote:
>>
>>>Yes, please!
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>>>Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2011 6:35 PM
>>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>Subject: Re: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>
>>>Do you want me to make up a schedule with Tid - can do it immediately,
>>>if you like
>>>
>>>Cheers
>>>Chris
>>>
>>>On 02/04/2011, at 6:26 PM, Horiuchi, Shinji wrote:
>>>
>>>>VC142 and V430a at 64MHz for DSS-45.
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>>>>Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2011 5:53 PM
>>>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>>Subject: Re: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>>
>>>>Hi Shinji
>>>>
>>>>Which experiment are we talking about....?
>>>>
>>>>On 02/04/2011, at 5:49 PM, Horiuchi, Shinji wrote:
>>>>
>Hi Phil,
>
>As of today I can't see Tid in the schedule file (.vex) etc. Is
>>still
>Tid expected?
>
>As I told you before, this would be recorded to LBA-DR without a
>PC-field system for this particular time as it's going to be used
>>for
>other project. Assuming Tid is required I will make up a predict
>>file
>>>>so
>that DSS-34 can point sources without the PC-field system.
>
>Cheers,
>Shinji.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>Sent: Friday, 1 April 2011 12:02 PM
>To: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au
>Cc: Cormac Reynolds
>Subject: FW: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>
>Hi Phil and Cormac,
>
>We have got those additional time scheduled. Let me know when vc142
>>>>and
>v430a schedule files are ready.
>
>Cormac, in case v271h proc file doesn't work for DSS-34, can I use
>>>>v271g
>one instead?
>
>Cheers,
>Shinji.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ward, Carleen
>Sent: Friday, 1 April 2011 10:59 AM
>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; Martinez, George
>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>
>Shinji,
>You should be able to see these in the schedule now.
>
>Thank you.
>
>Regards,
>Carleen
>
>THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR EXPORT CONTROL AND IT DOES NOT
>CONTAIN EXPORT CONTROLLED TECHNICAL DATA.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 2:30 PM
>To: Ward, Carleen; Martinez, George
>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>
>Carleen,
>
>These do not seem to be in place yet as far as I can see with
>>>>ClicTrack.
>Could you check?
>
>Regards,
>Shinji.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ward, Carleen
>Sent: Thursday, 31 March 2011 10:36 AM
>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; Martinez, George
>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>
>Shinji,
>On DOY 092, DSS-34 is only available from 1635-1910. If the station
>allows you to start during the GTL track, that would be between you
>>>>and
>the station. I can not schedule GBRA any earlier or it will create
>>a
>conflict.
>
>The following supports have been scheduled for you:
>
>092 1635 1635 1910 1910 DSS-34 GBRA TANAMI NONE
>1B2
>
>093 1150 1235 2150 2220 DSS-45 GBRA TANAMI NONE
>1B2
>
>Thank you.
>
>Regards,
>Carleen
>
>THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR EXPORT CONTROL AND IT DOES NOT
>CONTAIN EXPORT CONTROLLED TECHNICAL DATA.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 4:21 PM
>To: Ward, Carleen; Martinez, George
>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>
>Hi Carleen and George,
>
>Any chance to see these blocks that I am requesting (on DOY 92, 93,
>>>>and
>94) in the DSN schedule soon?
>
>The DSS-43 TANAMI run last night went very well and I recorded data
>>>>for
>nearly 13 hours. Thanks for your scheduling coordination. I returned
>>>>the
>70m to maintenance team this morning, anticipating to resume the 24
>>>>hour
>schedule whenever they finish the scheduled tasks.
>
>Cheers,
>Shinji.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>Sent: Wednesday, 30 March 2011 3:06 PM
>To: Ward, Carleen; Martinez, George
>Cc: 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>
>Carleen,
>
>Please add also the following small block after GTL,
>
>094/0010-0135 DSS-45 GBRA
>
>Cheers,
>Shinji.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>Sent: Wednesday, 30 March 2011 2:34 PM
>To: Ward, Carleen; Martinez, George
>Cc: 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>
>Hi Carleen,
>
>On top of the DOY092 block that I am requesting, could you extend
>>the
>following DSS-45 block to the end of the following free block?
>
>093/1150-1550 DSS-45 GBRA
>->
>093/1150-2220 DSS-45 GBRA
>
>Thanks!
>Shinji.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>Sent: Wednesday, 30 March 2011 9:44 AM
>To: Horiuchi, Shinji
>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>
>
>Hi Shinji,
>
>Thanks for this.
>Once Carleen okays it I'll revise the schedule.
>
>Cheers,
>Phil
>________________________________________
>From: Horiuchi, Shinji [shoriuchi_at_cdscc.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov]
>Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 9:00 AM
>To: Edwards, Phil (CASS, Marsfield); Ward, Carleen
>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>>>Teresa
>>>>O
>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>
>Hi Carleen,
>
>We have got DOY 92/0615-1445 DSS-34 GBRA block scheduled for LBA
>session, and I have just found the following gap is useful to extend
>>>>the
>fraction of coverage for this 24 hour VLBI experiment:
>
>092/1535-1910 DSS-34
>
>Could you please schedule this for GBRA as well? Because the
>interruption is less than an hour, we can just keep backend as it is
>running in background while DSS-34 is taken for Geotail tracking.
>
>Thanks and regards,
>Shinji.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>Sent: Tuesday, 25 January 2011 8:08 AM
>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; Ward, Carleen
>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>>>Teresa
>>>>O
>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>
>
>Thanks, Shinji.
>I'll start planning for that LBA session after the TAC meeting next
>week.
>
>Cheers,
>Phil
>
>________________________________________
>From: Horiuchi, Shinji [shoriuchi_at_cdscc.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 6:52 AM
>To: Ward, Carleen; Edwards, Phil (CASS, Marsfield)
>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>>>Teresa
>>>>O
>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>
>Hi Phil,
>
>Following the discussion with Carleen, I have confirmed that the
>following blocks have been scheduled for GBRA LBA/TANAMI:
>
>089/0925-1900 DSS43 (no overlap with LBA?)
>
>091/0650-1910 DSS43
>
>092/0615-1445 DSS34 (i.e. single pol, S/X/Ka-bands)
>
>093/0650-1250 DSS43,1150-1550 DSS34 (PC-field system is not
>>>available
>due to other VLBI support, i.e. not suited for 'very' fast
>>switching)
>
>Regards,
>Shinji.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>Sent: Saturday, 22 January 2011 9:56 AM
>To: Ward, Carleen; 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>Cc: 'Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov'; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>>>>Teresa
>O
>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>
>Hi Carleen,
>
>Yes, DSS-43 would be preferred on DOY 093. Then it would be good if
>>>>the
>schedule is started with DSS43 at 0650z, then followed with DSS34,
>>>say
>at 1150z allowing reasonable overlap.
>
>Regards,
>Shinji.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ward, Carleen
>Sent: Sat 1/22/2011 4:24 AM
>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>Cc: 'Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov'; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>>>>Teresa
>O
>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>
>Hi Shinij,
>Yes, unfortunately DSS-43 scheduled a downtime starting on DOY
>>>>087-088.
>To accommodate DSS-43 downtime, Cassini moved from DOY 088 TO DOY
>>>090.
>
>Question - Would DSS-43 on DOY 093 be preferred. I was under the
>impression GBRA could not be scheduled simultaneous with the RFC CAT
>activities. I may be able to move "PHASE STAB TEST" to another day.
>
>C1 093 0650 0650 1250 1250 DSS-43 DSN PHASE STAB TEST
>>>NONE
>2C1
>C2 0650 0735 1220 1250 GBRA TANAMI
>>>0037
>1B2
>
>In the meantime, I will go ahead schedule the additional time as you
>requested.
>
>Regards,
>Carleen
>
>THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR EXPORT CONTROL AND IT DOES NOT
>CONTAIN EXPORT CONTROLLED TECHNICAL DATA.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 8:56 AM
>To: Ward, Carleen; 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>Cc: 'Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov'; Martinez, George
>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>
>Hi Carleen and Phil,
>
>I see the DSN schedule around the LBA 2011 session is coming along,
>>>>and
>only the following have been scheduled:
>
>089/0925-1900 DSS43 GBRA-TANAMI (no actual overlap with LBA?)
>
>091/0650-1910 DSS43 GBRA-TANAMI
>
>Other than 70m, I can see the following 34m gaps,
>
>092/0615-1445 DSS34
>
>093/0610-1550 DSS45 (during DSS34 Cat XKa, i.e. no PC-field system
>>is
>available)
>
>I assume without PC-field system we can still track sources manually
>with timestamps while recording data to the LBA recorder.
>
>Carleen, could you please schedule those DSS34 and DSS45 gaps for
>>>GBRA
>TANAMI?
>
>Regards,
>Shinji.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ward, Carleen
>Sent: Friday, 17 December 2010 12:28 PM
>To: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au; Horiuchi, Shinji
>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George
>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>
>Hi Phil and Shinji,
>Yes, please let me know as soon as possible.
>
>Week 13 has not been negotiated but has been built. I've put in the
>following supports for the March 30th session:
>
>090 1205 1250 2045 2115 DSS-43 GBRA TANAMI 0037
>1B2
>091 0737 0822 2022 2052 DSS-43 GBRA TANAMI 0037
>1B2
>
>Please keep in mind the above mention supports are in the schedule
>>>but
>not yet cleared. Due to the holidays, this week will probabliy not
>>>be
>negotiated till next month.
>
>
>May the joy of Christmas be with you all through the year.
>~carleen
>
>THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR EXPORT CONTROL AND IT DOES NOT
>CONTAIN EXPORT CONTROLLED TECHNICAL DATA.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2010 7:43 PM
>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; Ward, Carleen
>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George
>Subject: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>
>
>Dear Carleen,
>
>Shinji has reminded me I should let you know the dates of our next
>>>LBA
>session.
>
>(We have short sessions in Dec, Jan and Feb, but with quite fixed
>>>>times,
>and so will
>simply see whether there are any suitable gaps in the DSN schedule
>>at
>those times --
>no forward planning is otherwise required.)
>
>The next long session will start on March 30 (DOY 089) and run to
>>the
>end of April 4
>(DOY 094). There's a good chance we'll have both X-band and K-band
>>>>runs
>for the
>TANAMI project in that time, so any GBRA time that can be reserved
>>>for
>those would
>be great.
>
>Thanks again for your help throughout the year, and all the best for
>>>>the
>festive season!
>
>Regards,
>Phil
>
>################################################################
>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>>>>business
>partners. The organisations accept no
>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>to being transmitted.
>################################################################
>################################################################
>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>>>>business
>partners. The organisations accept no
>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>to being transmitted.
>################################################################
>################################################################
>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>>>>business partners. The organisations accept no
>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>to being transmitted.
>################################################################
>>>>
>>>>################################################################
>>>>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>>>>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>>>>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>>>>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>>>>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>>>>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>>>business partners. The organisations accept no
>>>>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>>>>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>>>>to being transmitted.
>>>>################################################################
>>>
>>>################################################################
>>>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>>>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>>>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>>>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>>>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>>>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>>business partners. The organisations accept no
>>>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>>>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>>>to being transmitted.
>>>################################################################
>>
>>################################################################
>>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its business partners. The organisations accept no
>>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>>to being transmitted.
>>################################################################
>
>
-- ---------------------------------------------------- Cormac Reynolds Phone: +61 8 9266 3785 Fax: +61 8 9266 9246 email: c.reynolds_at_curtin.<!--nospam-->edu.au ----------------------------------------------------Received on 2011-04-03 18:00:33