Re: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: <c.reynolds_at_email.protected>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 16:17:17 +0800
the new schedule for vc142 is there now. It does not include
Warkworth, but I think it will be difficult to include Warkworth in
the fringe test with their incompatible 16 MHz mode anyway.
cheers,
Cormac
On 3 April 2011 15:59, Cormac Reynolds <c.reynolds_at_curtin.<!--nospam-->edu.au> wrote:
>sorry guys, I forgot to update that one. I'll do it now - will only
>take a few mins.
>
>
>On 3 April 2011 15:58, <Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au> wrote:
>>Yes - Shinji good point
>>
>>I will not really have much time if any before hand to create a new schedule... Just if you track the same source and same setup as v430a all should be good.
>>
>>Cheers
>>Chris
>>
>>On 03/04/2011, at 5:52 PM, Horiuchi, Shinji wrote:
>>
>>>Hi Chris,
>>>
>>>I have just realised that the schedule for the fringe test vc142 prior
>>>to v430a tonight is still for old one for different experiment (16MHz).
>>>What are we actually going to do with vc142? Shall we point 3c273 with
>>>the same setup for v430a (64MHz)?
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>Shinji.
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>>>Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2011 7:22 PM
>>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>Cc: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au; c.reynolds_at_curtin.<!--nospam-->edu.au
>>>Subject: Re: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>
>>>Hi Shinji
>>>
>>>Try:
>>>
>>>ftp.atnf.csiro.au:/pub/people/vlbi/v430/v430a/Tid/v430a.vex
>>>
>>>(or something like that).
>>>
>>>I had to remove Warkworth from this schedule but Tid seems OK.
>>>
>>>Just record a single 64 MHz channel in cdisko.
>>>
>>>Cheers
>>>Chris
>>>
>>>On 02/04/2011, at 7:15 PM, Horiuchi, Shinji wrote:
>>>
>>>>Yes, please!
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>>>>Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2011 6:35 PM
>>>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>>Subject: Re: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>>
>>>>Do you want me to make up a schedule with Tid - can do it immediately,
>>>>if you like
>>>>
>>>>Cheers
>>>>Chris
>>>>
>>>>On 02/04/2011, at 6:26 PM, Horiuchi, Shinji wrote:
>>>>
>VC142 and V430a at 64MHz for DSS-45.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2011 5:53 PM
>To: Horiuchi, Shinji
>Subject: Re: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>
>Hi Shinji
>
>Which experiment are we talking about....?
>
>On 02/04/2011, at 5:49 PM, Horiuchi, Shinji wrote:
>
>>Hi Phil,
>>
>>As of today I can't see Tid in the schedule file (.vex) etc. Is
>>>still
>>Tid expected?
>>
>>As I told you before, this would be recorded to LBA-DR without a
>>PC-field system for this particular time as it's going to be used
>>>for
>>other project. Assuming Tid is required I will make up a predict
>>>file
>so
>>that DSS-34 can point sources without the PC-field system.
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Shinji.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>Sent: Friday, 1 April 2011 12:02 PM
>>To: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au
>>Cc: Cormac Reynolds
>>Subject: FW: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>
>>Hi Phil and Cormac,
>>
>>We have got those additional time scheduled. Let me know when vc142
>and
>>v430a schedule files are ready.
>>
>>Cormac, in case v271h proc file doesn't work for DSS-34, can I use
>v271g
>>one instead?
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Shinji.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Ward, Carleen
>>Sent: Friday, 1 April 2011 10:59 AM
>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; Martinez, George
>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>
>>Shinji,
>>You should be able to see these in the schedule now.
>>
>>Thank you.
>>
>>Regards,
>>Carleen
>>
>>THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR EXPORT CONTROL AND IT DOES NOT
>>CONTAIN EXPORT CONTROLLED TECHNICAL DATA.
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 2:30 PM
>>To: Ward, Carleen; Martinez, George
>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>
>>Carleen,
>>
>>These do not seem to be in place yet as far as I can see with
>ClicTrack.
>>Could you check?
>>
>>Regards,
>>Shinji.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Ward, Carleen
>>Sent: Thursday, 31 March 2011 10:36 AM
>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; Martinez, George
>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>
>>Shinji,
>>On DOY 092, DSS-34 is only available from 1635-1910. If the station
>>allows you to start during the GTL track, that would be between you
>and
>>the station. I can not schedule GBRA any earlier or it will create
>>>a
>>conflict.
>>
>>The following supports have been scheduled for you:
>>
>>092 1635 1635 1910 1910 DSS-34 GBRA TANAMI NONE
>>1B2
>>
>>093 1150 1235 2150 2220 DSS-45 GBRA TANAMI NONE
>>1B2
>>
>>Thank you.
>>
>>Regards,
>>Carleen
>>
>>THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR EXPORT CONTROL AND IT DOES NOT
>>CONTAIN EXPORT CONTROLLED TECHNICAL DATA.
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 4:21 PM
>>To: Ward, Carleen; Martinez, George
>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>
>>Hi Carleen and George,
>>
>>Any chance to see these blocks that I am requesting (on DOY 92, 93,
>and
>>94) in the DSN schedule soon?
>>
>>The DSS-43 TANAMI run last night went very well and I recorded data
>for
>>nearly 13 hours. Thanks for your scheduling coordination. I returned
>the
>>70m to maintenance team this morning, anticipating to resume the 24
>hour
>>schedule whenever they finish the scheduled tasks.
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Shinji.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>Sent: Wednesday, 30 March 2011 3:06 PM
>>To: Ward, Carleen; Martinez, George
>>Cc: 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>
>>Carleen,
>>
>>Please add also the following small block after GTL,
>>
>>094/0010-0135 DSS-45 GBRA
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Shinji.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>Sent: Wednesday, 30 March 2011 2:34 PM
>>To: Ward, Carleen; Martinez, George
>>Cc: 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>
>>Hi Carleen,
>>
>>On top of the DOY092 block that I am requesting, could you extend
>>>the
>>following DSS-45 block to the end of the following free block?
>>
>>093/1150-1550 DSS-45 GBRA
>>->
>>093/1150-2220 DSS-45 GBRA
>>
>>Thanks!
>>Shinji.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>>Sent: Wednesday, 30 March 2011 9:44 AM
>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>
>>
>>Hi Shinji,
>>
>>Thanks for this.
>>Once Carleen okays it I'll revise the schedule.
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Phil
>>________________________________________
>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji [shoriuchi_at_cdscc.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov]
>>Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 9:00 AM
>>To: Edwards, Phil (CASS, Marsfield); Ward, Carleen
>>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>>>>Teresa
>O
>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>
>>Hi Carleen,
>>
>>We have got DOY 92/0615-1445 DSS-34 GBRA block scheduled for LBA
>>session, and I have just found the following gap is useful to extend
>the
>>fraction of coverage for this 24 hour VLBI experiment:
>>
>>092/1535-1910 DSS-34
>>
>>Could you please schedule this for GBRA as well? Because the
>>interruption is less than an hour, we can just keep backend as it is
>>running in background while DSS-34 is taken for Geotail tracking.
>>
>>Thanks and regards,
>>Shinji.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>>Sent: Tuesday, 25 January 2011 8:08 AM
>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; Ward, Carleen
>>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>>>>Teresa
>O
>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>
>>
>>Thanks, Shinji.
>>I'll start planning for that LBA session after the TAC meeting next
>>week.
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Phil
>>
>>________________________________________
>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji [shoriuchi_at_cdscc.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov]
>>Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 6:52 AM
>>To: Ward, Carleen; Edwards, Phil (CASS, Marsfield)
>>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>>>>Teresa
>O
>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>
>>Hi Phil,
>>
>>Following the discussion with Carleen, I have confirmed that the
>>following blocks have been scheduled for GBRA LBA/TANAMI:
>>
>>089/0925-1900 DSS43 (no overlap with LBA?)
>>
>>091/0650-1910 DSS43
>>
>>092/0615-1445 DSS34 (i.e. single pol, S/X/Ka-bands)
>>
>>093/0650-1250 DSS43,1150-1550 DSS34 (PC-field system is not
>>>>available
>>due to other VLBI support, i.e. not suited for 'very' fast
>>>switching)
>>
>>Regards,
>>Shinji.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>Sent: Saturday, 22 January 2011 9:56 AM
>>To: Ward, Carleen; 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>>Cc: 'Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov'; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>Teresa
>>O
>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>
>>Hi Carleen,
>>
>>Yes, DSS-43 would be preferred on DOY 093. Then it would be good if
>the
>>schedule is started with DSS43 at 0650z, then followed with DSS34,
>>>>say
>>at 1150z allowing reasonable overlap.
>>
>>Regards,
>>Shinji.
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Ward, Carleen
>>Sent: Sat 1/22/2011 4:24 AM
>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>>Cc: 'Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov'; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>Teresa
>>O
>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>
>>Hi Shinij,
>>Yes, unfortunately DSS-43 scheduled a downtime starting on DOY
>087-088.
>>To accommodate DSS-43 downtime, Cassini moved from DOY 088 TO DOY
>>>>090.
>>
>>Question - Would DSS-43 on DOY 093 be preferred. I was under the
>>impression GBRA could not be scheduled simultaneous with the RFC CAT
>>activities. I may be able to move "PHASE STAB TEST" to another day.
>>
>>C1 093 0650 0650 1250 1250 DSS-43 DSN PHASE STAB TEST
>>>>NONE
>>2C1
>>C2 0650 0735 1220 1250 GBRA TANAMI
>>>>0037
>>1B2
>>
>>In the meantime, I will go ahead schedule the additional time as you
>>requested.
>>
>>Regards,
>>Carleen
>>
>>THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR EXPORT CONTROL AND IT DOES NOT
>>CONTAIN EXPORT CONTROLLED TECHNICAL DATA.
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 8:56 AM
>>To: Ward, Carleen; 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>>Cc: 'Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov'; Martinez, George
>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>
>>Hi Carleen and Phil,
>>
>>I see the DSN schedule around the LBA 2011 session is coming along,
>and
>>only the following have been scheduled:
>>
>>089/0925-1900 DSS43 GBRA-TANAMI (no actual overlap with LBA?)
>>
>>091/0650-1910 DSS43 GBRA-TANAMI
>>
>>Other than 70m, I can see the following 34m gaps,
>>
>>092/0615-1445 DSS34
>>
>>093/0610-1550 DSS45 (during DSS34 Cat XKa, i.e. no PC-field system
>>>is
>>available)
>>
>>I assume without PC-field system we can still track sources manually
>>with timestamps while recording data to the LBA recorder.
>>
>>Carleen, could you please schedule those DSS34 and DSS45 gaps for
>>>>GBRA
>>TANAMI?
>>
>>Regards,
>>Shinji.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Ward, Carleen
>>Sent: Friday, 17 December 2010 12:28 PM
>>To: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au; Horiuchi, Shinji
>>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George
>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>
>>Hi Phil and Shinji,
>>Yes, please let me know as soon as possible.
>>
>>Week 13 has not been negotiated but has been built. I've put in the
>>following supports for the March 30th session:
>>
>>090 1205 1250 2045 2115 DSS-43 GBRA TANAMI 0037
>>1B2
>>091 0737 0822 2022 2052 DSS-43 GBRA TANAMI 0037
>>1B2
>>
>>Please keep in mind the above mention supports are in the schedule
>>>>but
>>not yet cleared. Due to the holidays, this week will probabliy not
>>>>be
>>negotiated till next month.
>>
>>
>>May the joy of Christmas be with you all through the year.
>>~carleen
>>
>>THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR EXPORT CONTROL AND IT DOES NOT
>>CONTAIN EXPORT CONTROLLED TECHNICAL DATA.
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>>Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2010 7:43 PM
>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; Ward, Carleen
>>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George
>>Subject: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>
>>
>>Dear Carleen,
>>
>>Shinji has reminded me I should let you know the dates of our next
>>>>LBA
>>session.
>>
>>(We have short sessions in Dec, Jan and Feb, but with quite fixed
>times,
>>and so will
>>simply see whether there are any suitable gaps in the DSN schedule
>>>at
>>those times --
>>no forward planning is otherwise required.)
>>
>>The next long session will start on March 30 (DOY 089) and run to
>>>the
>>end of April 4
>>(DOY 094). There's a good chance we'll have both X-band and K-band
>runs
>>for the
>>TANAMI project in that time, so any GBRA time that can be reserved
>>>>for
>>those would
>>be great.
>>
>>Thanks again for your help throughout the year, and all the best for
>the
>>festive season!
>>
>>Regards,
>>Phil
>>
>>################################################################
>>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>business
>>partners. The organisations accept no
>>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>>to being transmitted.
>>################################################################
>>################################################################
>>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>business
>>partners. The organisations accept no
>>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>>to being transmitted.
>>################################################################
>>################################################################
>>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>business partners. The organisations accept no
>>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>>to being transmitted.
>>################################################################
>
>################################################################
>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>>>>business partners. The organisations accept no
>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>to being transmitted.
>################################################################
>>>>
>>>>################################################################
>>>>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>>>>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>>>>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>>>>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>>>>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>>>>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>>>business partners. The organisations accept no
>>>>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>>>>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>>>>to being transmitted.
>>>>################################################################
>>>
>>>################################################################
>>>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>>>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>>>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>>>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>>>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>>>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its business partners. The organisations accept no
>>>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>>>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>>>to being transmitted.
>>>################################################################
>>
>>
>
>
>
>--
>----------------------------------------------------
>Cormac Reynolds
>Phone: +61 8 9266 3785
>Fax: +61 8 9266 9246
>email: c.reynolds_at_curtin.<!--nospam-->edu.au
>----------------------------------------------------
>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 16:17:17 +0800
the new schedule for vc142 is there now. It does not include
Warkworth, but I think it will be difficult to include Warkworth in
the fringe test with their incompatible 16 MHz mode anyway.
cheers,
Cormac
On 3 April 2011 15:59, Cormac Reynolds <c.reynolds_at_curtin.<!--nospam-->edu.au> wrote:
>sorry guys, I forgot to update that one. I'll do it now - will only
>take a few mins.
>
>
>On 3 April 2011 15:58, <Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au> wrote:
>>Yes - Shinji good point
>>
>>I will not really have much time if any before hand to create a new schedule... Just if you track the same source and same setup as v430a all should be good.
>>
>>Cheers
>>Chris
>>
>>On 03/04/2011, at 5:52 PM, Horiuchi, Shinji wrote:
>>
>>>Hi Chris,
>>>
>>>I have just realised that the schedule for the fringe test vc142 prior
>>>to v430a tonight is still for old one for different experiment (16MHz).
>>>What are we actually going to do with vc142? Shall we point 3c273 with
>>>the same setup for v430a (64MHz)?
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>Shinji.
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>>>Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2011 7:22 PM
>>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>Cc: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au; c.reynolds_at_curtin.<!--nospam-->edu.au
>>>Subject: Re: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>
>>>Hi Shinji
>>>
>>>Try:
>>>
>>>ftp.atnf.csiro.au:/pub/people/vlbi/v430/v430a/Tid/v430a.vex
>>>
>>>(or something like that).
>>>
>>>I had to remove Warkworth from this schedule but Tid seems OK.
>>>
>>>Just record a single 64 MHz channel in cdisko.
>>>
>>>Cheers
>>>Chris
>>>
>>>On 02/04/2011, at 7:15 PM, Horiuchi, Shinji wrote:
>>>
>>>>Yes, please!
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>>>>Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2011 6:35 PM
>>>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>>>Subject: Re: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>>>
>>>>Do you want me to make up a schedule with Tid - can do it immediately,
>>>>if you like
>>>>
>>>>Cheers
>>>>Chris
>>>>
>>>>On 02/04/2011, at 6:26 PM, Horiuchi, Shinji wrote:
>>>>
>VC142 and V430a at 64MHz for DSS-45.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Chris.Phillips_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>Sent: Saturday, 2 April 2011 5:53 PM
>To: Horiuchi, Shinji
>Subject: Re: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>
>Hi Shinji
>
>Which experiment are we talking about....?
>
>On 02/04/2011, at 5:49 PM, Horiuchi, Shinji wrote:
>
>>Hi Phil,
>>
>>As of today I can't see Tid in the schedule file (.vex) etc. Is
>>>still
>>Tid expected?
>>
>>As I told you before, this would be recorded to LBA-DR without a
>>PC-field system for this particular time as it's going to be used
>>>for
>>other project. Assuming Tid is required I will make up a predict
>>>file
>so
>>that DSS-34 can point sources without the PC-field system.
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Shinji.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>Sent: Friday, 1 April 2011 12:02 PM
>>To: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au
>>Cc: Cormac Reynolds
>>Subject: FW: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>
>>Hi Phil and Cormac,
>>
>>We have got those additional time scheduled. Let me know when vc142
>and
>>v430a schedule files are ready.
>>
>>Cormac, in case v271h proc file doesn't work for DSS-34, can I use
>v271g
>>one instead?
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Shinji.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Ward, Carleen
>>Sent: Friday, 1 April 2011 10:59 AM
>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; Martinez, George
>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>
>>Shinji,
>>You should be able to see these in the schedule now.
>>
>>Thank you.
>>
>>Regards,
>>Carleen
>>
>>THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR EXPORT CONTROL AND IT DOES NOT
>>CONTAIN EXPORT CONTROLLED TECHNICAL DATA.
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 2:30 PM
>>To: Ward, Carleen; Martinez, George
>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>
>>Carleen,
>>
>>These do not seem to be in place yet as far as I can see with
>ClicTrack.
>>Could you check?
>>
>>Regards,
>>Shinji.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Ward, Carleen
>>Sent: Thursday, 31 March 2011 10:36 AM
>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; Martinez, George
>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>
>>Shinji,
>>On DOY 092, DSS-34 is only available from 1635-1910. If the station
>>allows you to start during the GTL track, that would be between you
>and
>>the station. I can not schedule GBRA any earlier or it will create
>>>a
>>conflict.
>>
>>The following supports have been scheduled for you:
>>
>>092 1635 1635 1910 1910 DSS-34 GBRA TANAMI NONE
>>1B2
>>
>>093 1150 1235 2150 2220 DSS-45 GBRA TANAMI NONE
>>1B2
>>
>>Thank you.
>>
>>Regards,
>>Carleen
>>
>>THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR EXPORT CONTROL AND IT DOES NOT
>>CONTAIN EXPORT CONTROLLED TECHNICAL DATA.
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 4:21 PM
>>To: Ward, Carleen; Martinez, George
>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>
>>Hi Carleen and George,
>>
>>Any chance to see these blocks that I am requesting (on DOY 92, 93,
>and
>>94) in the DSN schedule soon?
>>
>>The DSS-43 TANAMI run last night went very well and I recorded data
>for
>>nearly 13 hours. Thanks for your scheduling coordination. I returned
>the
>>70m to maintenance team this morning, anticipating to resume the 24
>hour
>>schedule whenever they finish the scheduled tasks.
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Shinji.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>Sent: Wednesday, 30 March 2011 3:06 PM
>>To: Ward, Carleen; Martinez, George
>>Cc: 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>
>>Carleen,
>>
>>Please add also the following small block after GTL,
>>
>>094/0010-0135 DSS-45 GBRA
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Shinji.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>Sent: Wednesday, 30 March 2011 2:34 PM
>>To: Ward, Carleen; Martinez, George
>>Cc: 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>
>>Hi Carleen,
>>
>>On top of the DOY092 block that I am requesting, could you extend
>>>the
>>following DSS-45 block to the end of the following free block?
>>
>>093/1150-1550 DSS-45 GBRA
>>->
>>093/1150-2220 DSS-45 GBRA
>>
>>Thanks!
>>Shinji.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>>Sent: Wednesday, 30 March 2011 9:44 AM
>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>
>>
>>Hi Shinji,
>>
>>Thanks for this.
>>Once Carleen okays it I'll revise the schedule.
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Phil
>>________________________________________
>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji [shoriuchi_at_cdscc.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov]
>>Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 9:00 AM
>>To: Edwards, Phil (CASS, Marsfield); Ward, Carleen
>>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>>>>Teresa
>O
>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>
>>Hi Carleen,
>>
>>We have got DOY 92/0615-1445 DSS-34 GBRA block scheduled for LBA
>>session, and I have just found the following gap is useful to extend
>the
>>fraction of coverage for this 24 hour VLBI experiment:
>>
>>092/1535-1910 DSS-34
>>
>>Could you please schedule this for GBRA as well? Because the
>>interruption is less than an hour, we can just keep backend as it is
>>running in background while DSS-34 is taken for Geotail tracking.
>>
>>Thanks and regards,
>>Shinji.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>>Sent: Tuesday, 25 January 2011 8:08 AM
>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; Ward, Carleen
>>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>>>>Teresa
>O
>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>
>>
>>Thanks, Shinji.
>>I'll start planning for that LBA session after the TAC meeting next
>>week.
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Phil
>>
>>________________________________________
>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji [shoriuchi_at_cdscc.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov]
>>Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 6:52 AM
>>To: Ward, Carleen; Edwards, Phil (CASS, Marsfield)
>>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>>>>Teresa
>O
>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>
>>Hi Phil,
>>
>>Following the discussion with Carleen, I have confirmed that the
>>following blocks have been scheduled for GBRA LBA/TANAMI:
>>
>>089/0925-1900 DSS43 (no overlap with LBA?)
>>
>>091/0650-1910 DSS43
>>
>>092/0615-1445 DSS34 (i.e. single pol, S/X/Ka-bands)
>>
>>093/0650-1250 DSS43,1150-1550 DSS34 (PC-field system is not
>>>>available
>>due to other VLBI support, i.e. not suited for 'very' fast
>>>switching)
>>
>>Regards,
>>Shinji.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>Sent: Saturday, 22 January 2011 9:56 AM
>>To: Ward, Carleen; 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>>Cc: 'Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov'; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>Teresa
>>O
>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>
>>Hi Carleen,
>>
>>Yes, DSS-43 would be preferred on DOY 093. Then it would be good if
>the
>>schedule is started with DSS43 at 0650z, then followed with DSS34,
>>>>say
>>at 1150z allowing reasonable overlap.
>>
>>Regards,
>>Shinji.
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Ward, Carleen
>>Sent: Sat 1/22/2011 4:24 AM
>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>>Cc: 'Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov'; Martinez, George; Thomas,
>Teresa
>>O
>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>
>>Hi Shinij,
>>Yes, unfortunately DSS-43 scheduled a downtime starting on DOY
>087-088.
>>To accommodate DSS-43 downtime, Cassini moved from DOY 088 TO DOY
>>>>090.
>>
>>Question - Would DSS-43 on DOY 093 be preferred. I was under the
>>impression GBRA could not be scheduled simultaneous with the RFC CAT
>>activities. I may be able to move "PHASE STAB TEST" to another day.
>>
>>C1 093 0650 0650 1250 1250 DSS-43 DSN PHASE STAB TEST
>>>>NONE
>>2C1
>>C2 0650 0735 1220 1250 GBRA TANAMI
>>>>0037
>>1B2
>>
>>In the meantime, I will go ahead schedule the additional time as you
>>requested.
>>
>>Regards,
>>Carleen
>>
>>THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR EXPORT CONTROL AND IT DOES NOT
>>CONTAIN EXPORT CONTROLLED TECHNICAL DATA.
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Horiuchi, Shinji
>>Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 8:56 AM
>>To: Ward, Carleen; 'Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au'
>>Cc: 'Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov'; Martinez, George
>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>
>>Hi Carleen and Phil,
>>
>>I see the DSN schedule around the LBA 2011 session is coming along,
>and
>>only the following have been scheduled:
>>
>>089/0925-1900 DSS43 GBRA-TANAMI (no actual overlap with LBA?)
>>
>>091/0650-1910 DSS43 GBRA-TANAMI
>>
>>Other than 70m, I can see the following 34m gaps,
>>
>>092/0615-1445 DSS34
>>
>>093/0610-1550 DSS45 (during DSS34 Cat XKa, i.e. no PC-field system
>>>is
>>available)
>>
>>I assume without PC-field system we can still track sources manually
>>with timestamps while recording data to the LBA recorder.
>>
>>Carleen, could you please schedule those DSS34 and DSS45 gaps for
>>>>GBRA
>>TANAMI?
>>
>>Regards,
>>Shinji.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Ward, Carleen
>>Sent: Friday, 17 December 2010 12:28 PM
>>To: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au; Horiuchi, Shinji
>>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George
>>Subject: RE: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>
>>Hi Phil and Shinji,
>>Yes, please let me know as soon as possible.
>>
>>Week 13 has not been negotiated but has been built. I've put in the
>>following supports for the March 30th session:
>>
>>090 1205 1250 2045 2115 DSS-43 GBRA TANAMI 0037
>>1B2
>>091 0737 0822 2022 2052 DSS-43 GBRA TANAMI 0037
>>1B2
>>
>>Please keep in mind the above mention supports are in the schedule
>>>>but
>>not yet cleared. Due to the holidays, this week will probabliy not
>>>>be
>>negotiated till next month.
>>
>>
>>May the joy of Christmas be with you all through the year.
>>~carleen
>>
>>THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR EXPORT CONTROL AND IT DOES NOT
>>CONTAIN EXPORT CONTROLLED TECHNICAL DATA.
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au [mailto:Philip.Edwards_at_csiro.<!--nospam-->au]
>>Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2010 7:43 PM
>>To: Horiuchi, Shinji; Ward, Carleen
>>Cc: Lawrence.Teitelbaum_at_jpl.<!--nospam-->nasa.gov; Martinez, George
>>Subject: GBRA request for 2011 Mar/Apr session
>>
>>
>>Dear Carleen,
>>
>>Shinji has reminded me I should let you know the dates of our next
>>>>LBA
>>session.
>>
>>(We have short sessions in Dec, Jan and Feb, but with quite fixed
>times,
>>and so will
>>simply see whether there are any suitable gaps in the DSN schedule
>>>at
>>those times --
>>no forward planning is otherwise required.)
>>
>>The next long session will start on March 30 (DOY 089) and run to
>>>the
>>end of April 4
>>(DOY 094). There's a good chance we'll have both X-band and K-band
>runs
>>for the
>>TANAMI project in that time, so any GBRA time that can be reserved
>>>>for
>>those would
>>be great.
>>
>>Thanks again for your help throughout the year, and all the best for
>the
>>festive season!
>>
>>Regards,
>>Phil
>>
>>################################################################
>>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>business
>>partners. The organisations accept no
>>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>>to being transmitted.
>>################################################################
>>################################################################
>>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>business
>>partners. The organisations accept no
>>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>>to being transmitted.
>>################################################################
>>################################################################
>>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>business partners. The organisations accept no
>>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>>to being transmitted.
>>################################################################
>
>################################################################
>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>>>>business partners. The organisations accept no
>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>to being transmitted.
>################################################################
>>>>
>>>>################################################################
>>>>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>>>>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>>>>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>>>>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>>>>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>>>>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its
>>>business partners. The organisations accept no
>>>>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>>>>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>>>>to being transmitted.
>>>>################################################################
>>>
>>>################################################################
>>>If you received this email in error, please notify the sender
>>>immediately and delete the email and attachments. This email may
>>>contain private or sensitive information. Any forwarding or
>>>dissemination of information, other than by entities directly
>>>addressed in this email is prohibited. The views expressed in
>>>this email do not necessarily reflect the views of CDSCC or its business partners. The organisations accept no
>>>responsibility for any virus that potentially could be
>>>transmitted in this email, however all email is scanned prior
>>>to being transmitted.
>>>################################################################
>>
>>
>
>
>
>--
>----------------------------------------------------
>Cormac Reynolds
>Phone: +61 8 9266 3785
>Fax: +61 8 9266 9246
>email: c.reynolds_at_curtin.<!--nospam-->edu.au
>----------------------------------------------------
>
-- ---------------------------------------------------- Cormac Reynolds Phone: +61 8 9266 3785 Fax: +61 8 9266 9246 email: c.reynolds_at_curtin.<!--nospam-->edu.au ----------------------------------------------------Received on 2011-04-03 18:17:43