From: <stingay_at_email.protected>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 11:08:35 +1000 (EST)

Hi Jim,

Your nominated dates make sense.

From Swinburne, I will be missing, as the annual SKA meeting is right next
Status: O

to the URSI meeting in Pune. We will be without Craig at that point,
leaving Emil, Adam, Shinji, and Richard as possibilities for November.

Cheers, Steven

##=====================================================##
Dr Steven Tingay stingay_at_astro.swin.edu.au
Swinburne SKA Project Leader
Senior Lecturer

Centre for Astrophysics and Supercomputing
Swinburne University of Technology
Mail No H39
P.O. Box 218, Hawthorn, Vic. 3122, Australia

ph: +61 3 9214 8758
fax: +61 3 9214 8797

http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/ska
##=====================================================##

On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Jim Lovell wrote:

>Hi everyone,
>
>So far November 1-7 seems the best week for the first session but this relies
>on Parkes starting their maintenance a tad late. John?
>
>On 24/06/2005, at 5:40 PM, Tasso Tzioumis wrote:
>
>>> Oct 24-30 is URSI meeting. Probably few people affected (mainly me?)
>
>Is anyone else going to the URSI meeting?
>
>>> Steve suggested January. That can be difficult with many people on
>>> vacation.
>>> Is Tid going to be back in January?
>>> Also, January + March makes the tape situation difficult. It's not
>>> impossible if I become a bit more ruthless.
>
>The 70m is due back in January. At this stage though the DSN schedule doesn't
>go past the end of the year so it's impossible to nominate a suitable week at
>the moment.
>
>I wanted to avoid January for the reasons Tasso gives above.
>
>There are enough proposals not requiring Tid that I could fill a week in
>October/November without a problem.
>
>My hope is that March is sufficiently far in the future that the DSN
>schedulers will be able to move as much 70m time as possible into the week we
>nominate.
>
>Cheers,
>Jim
>
>
Received on 2005-06-27 11:08:35