Observational Tests of a Double Loop Model for Solar Flares

S. J. Hardy , D. B. Melrose , H. S. Hudson, PASA, 15 (3), 318
The html and gzipped postscript versions of this paper are in preprint form.
To access the final published version, download the pdf file
.

Next Section: Application of model
Title/Abstract Page: Observational Tests of a
Previous Section: Introduction
Contents Page: Volume 15, Number 3

Current redistribution model for flares

The model proposed in M97 is that solar flares occur when two current carrying flux loops interact. Current and flux are transferred between the loops by magnetic reconnection. The energy released is determined by the difference between the magnetic energy stored in the current configuration before and after the flare. It is important to note that the timescale of flares is such that the currents through the photosphere do not have time to change over the course of the flare. This implies that only the photospheric boundary conditions on the magnetic field and the current are fixed by the initial conditions, and that subphotospheric processes play no role during the flare.

The model

  figure20
Figure 1: Sketch of model of current and flux redistribution during a solar flare. The energy released during the flare is identified with the change of magnetic energy associated with the redistribution of currents above the photosphere.

Consider the current geometry shown in Figure 1. Four footpoints are shown on the solar photosphere where current and magnetic flux either emerge or reenter. Before the flare, there are two current carrying loops between these footpoints with some point of intersection at which reconnection occurs. During the flare some of the current, tex2html_wrap_inline337, and some of the flux, tex2html_wrap_inline339 is transferred from the initial loops to new loops connecting the footpoints. The energy released through the current transfer shown in Figure 1 is given by
 equation29
where
 equation33
with
equation38

equation45
and where tex2html_wrap_inline341 denotes the mutual inductances of the current carrying loops, and tex2html_wrap_inline343 are the self inductances of the current carrying loops. The indexing of the loops is given by tex2html_wrap_inline345, tex2html_wrap_inline347, tex2html_wrap_inline349, and tex2html_wrap_inline351 where the footpoints are labeled as in Figure 1. The division of equation (1) into irreducible reconnection (IR) and like-current separation (LCS) terms is discussed further in M97.

Equation ({1) is basis of the model of M97. If tex2html_wrap_inline353 is positive, the geometry of the situation is such that a current transfer leads to a net release of energy, and a flare is expected. However, if tex2html_wrap_inline353 is negative, a redistribution of currents would lead to a net increase of energy and would need another source of energy to drive it. Such a change could not occur spontaneously, and such configurations should not produce a flare.

There is a maximum allowed current transfer, imposed by the requirement that the photospheric currents not change, equal to the minimum of the currents flowing in the initial loops. (Note that M97 is in error when it says that the maximum current transferred is tex2html_wrap_inline357.) As particular loop structures within active regions may undergo multiple flaring events, the maximum current need not be transferred in a single flare. However, for the configurations investigated here, tex2html_wrap_inline353 scales monotonically with the magnitude of the current transfer. Thus, assuming that maximal current transfer does take place allows the geometries which produce flares to be identified, without introducing a parameter representing the fraction of the maximal current which is transferred. Maximal current transfer is assumed throughout unless otherwise stated.

Mutual inductances of the loops

The mutual inductances of the current carrying chromospheric loops are defined by the current distributions within the loops. Clearly some approximation must be made to these to treat flares in any generality. M97 assumed that the loops are approximated as half tori which are aligned vertically with respect to the photosphere. The self-inductance of a loop with major radius tex2html_wrap_inline363 and minor radius tex2html_wrap_inline365 is given by (Landau and Lifshitz 1960, p. 139)
equation59
with
equation61
The term 7/4 corresponds to a uniform current profile.

The mutual inductance between two loops has not been solved analytically for a general configuration of the loops. There are, however, a number of limiting cases, and M97 presents an interpolation formula between these known results. Consider two loops of major radii tex2html_wrap_inline369 and tex2html_wrap_inline363, with centres separated by tex2html_wrap_inline373, and which are oriented with an angle tex2html_wrap_inline375 between them. The interpolation formula derived in M97 is
 equation68
The interpolation formula, equation (7) is used here in the calculation of the energy difference between the pre- and post-flare states.


Next Section: Application of model
Title/Abstract Page: Observational Tests of a
Previous Section: Introduction
Contents Page: Volume 15, Number 3

Welcome... About Electronic PASA... Instructions to Authors
ASA Home Page... CSIRO Publishing PASA
Browse Articles HOME Search Articles
© Copyright Astronomical Society of Australia 1997
ASKAP
Public